CatDB: Data-catalog-guided, LLM-based Generation of Data-centric ML Pipelines
Saeed Fathollahzadeh, Essam Mansour, Matthias Boehm
Abstract
Data-centric machine learning (ML) pipelines extend traditional ML pipelines—of feature transformations, hyper-parameter tuning, and model training—by additional pre-processing steps for data cleaning, data augmentation, and feature engineering to create high-quality data with good coverage. Finding effective data-centric ML pipelines is still a labor- and compute-intensive process though. While AutoML tools use effective search strategies, they struggle to scale with large datasets. Large language models (LLMs) show promise for code generation but face challenges in generating data-centric ML pipelines due to private datasets not seen during training, complex pre-processing requirements, and the need for mitigating hallucinations. These demands exceed typical code generation as it requires actions tailored to the characteristics and requirements of a particular dataset. This paper introduces CatDB, a comprehensive, LLM-based system for generating effective, error-free, and efficient data-centric ML pipelines. CatDB leverages data catalog information and refined metadata to dynamically create dataset-specific rules (instructions) to guide the LLM. Moreover, CatDB includes a robust mechanism for automatic validation and error handling of the generated pipeline. Our experimental results show that CatDB reliably generates effective ML pipelines across diverse datasets, achieving accuracy comparable to or better than existing LLM-based systems, standalone AutoML tools, and combined workflows of data cleaning and AutoML tools, while delivering up to orders of magnitude faster performance on large datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d7fad019-9fe1-4609-b0d2-83c3f8fc9ed1Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on18
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark EvaluationDawei Gao, Haibin Wang, Yaliang Li, Xiuyu Sun et al.VLDB 2024 · 609 citations
- Can Foundation Models Wrangle Your Data?Avanika Narayan, Ines Chami, Laurel J. Orr, Christopher RéVLDB 2023 · 325 citations
- Large Language Models for Automated Data Science: Introducing CAAFE for Context-Aware Automated Feature EngineeringNoah Hollmann, Samuel Müller, Frank HutterNeurIPS 2023 · 210 citations
- CleanML: A Study for Evaluating the Impact of Data Cleaning on ML Classification TasksPeng Li, Xi Rao, Jennifer Blase, Yue Zhang et al.ICDE 2021 · 127 citations
Related papers
- Adda: Towards Efficient in-Database Feature Generation via LLM-based AgentsKuan Lu, Zhihui Yang, Sai Wu, Ruichen Xia et al.SIGMOD 2025 · 6 citations
- λ-Tune: Harnessing Large Language Models for Automated Database System TuningVictor Giannakouris, Immanuel TrummerSIGMOD 2025 · 20 citations
- BAT: Target-Instance-Free Data Preparation Synthesis via LLM-Driven Tree SearchCongcong Ge, Yachuan Liu, Yixuan Tang, Yifan Zhu et al.SIGMOD 2026
- DeepPrep: An LLM-Powered Agentic System for Autonomous Data PreparationMeihao Fan, Ju Fan, Yuxin Zhang, Shaolei Zhang et al.VLDB 2026 · 4 citations
- AutoML-Agent: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Full-Pipeline AutoMLPatara Trirat, Wonyong Jeong, Sung Ju HwangICML 2025
