CleanML: A Study for Evaluating the Impact of Data Cleaning on ML Classification Tasks
Peng Li, Xi Rao, Jennifer Blase, Yue Zhang, Xu Chu, Ce Zhang
Abstract
Data quality affects machine learning (ML) model performances, and data scientists spend considerable amount of time on data cleaning before model training. However, to date, there does not exist a rigorous study on how exactly cleaning affects ML - ML community usually focuses on developing ML algorithms that are robust to some particular noise types of certain distributions, while database (DB) community has been mostly studying the problem of data cleaning alone without considering how data is consumed by downstream ML analytics.We propose a CleanML study that systematically investigates the impact of data cleaning on ML classification tasks. The open-source and extensible CleanML study currently includes 14 real-world datasets with real errors, five common error types, seven different ML models, and multiple cleaning algorithms for each error type (including both commonly used algorithms in practice as well as state-of-the-art solutions in academic literature). We control the randomness in ML experiments using statistical hypothesis testing, and we also control false discovery rate in our experiments using the Benjamini-Yekutieli (BY) procedure. We analyze the results in a systematic way to derive many interesting and nontrivial observations. We also put forward multiple research directions for researchers.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 14708bd3-d11c-41aa-93a1-2af28de86f27Cited by top-tier papers26
- GoodCore: Data-effective and Data-efficient Machine Learning through Coreset Selection over Incomplete DataChengliang Chai, Jiabin Liu, Nan Tang, Ju Fan et al.SIGMOD 2023 · 37 citations
- Entity Resolution On-DemandGiovanni Simonini, Luca Zecchini, Sonia Bergamaschi, Felix NaumannVLDB 2022 · 33 citations
- Sudowoodo: Contrastive Self-supervised Learning for Multi-purpose Data Integration and PreparationRunhui Wang, Yuliang Li, Jin WangICDE 2023 · 32 citations
- Automatic Data Repair: Are We Ready to Deploy?Wei Ni, Xiaoye Miao, Xiangyu Zhao, Yangyang Wu et al.VLDB 2024 · 26 citations
- DiffPrep: Differentiable Data Preprocessing Pipeline Search for Learning over Tabular DataPeng Li, Zhiyi Chen, Xu Chu, Kexin RongSIGMOD 2023 · 24 citations
Builds on2
- ZeroER: Entity Resolution using Zero Labeled ExamplesRenzhi Wu, Sanya Chaba, Saurabh Sawlani, Xu Chu et al.SIGMOD 2020 · 77 citations
- Nearest Neighbor Classifiers over Incomplete Information: From Certain Answers to Certain PredictionsBojan Karlas, Peng Li, Renzhi Wu, Nezihe Merve Gürel et al.VLDB 2021 · 69 citations
Related papers
- DeMix: Debugging Training Data with Mixed Data Error Types by Investigating Influence VectorsJiale Deng, Yanyan Shen, Xiaogang Shi, Junjun ChaiKDD 2026
- Are we building on the rock? on the importance of data preprocessing for code summarizationLin Shi, Fangwen Mu, Xiao Chen, Song Wang et al.FSE 2022 · 65 citations
- SAGA: A Scalable Framework for Optimizing Data Cleaning Pipelines for Machine Learning ApplicationsShafaq Siddiqi, Roman Kern, Matthias BoehmSIGMOD 2024 · 24 citations
- Automatic Feasibility Study via Data Quality Analysis for ML: A Case-Study on Label NoiseCédric Renggli, Luka Rimanic, Luka Kolar, Wentao Wu et al.ICDE 2023 · 8 citations
- How do Categorical Duplicates Affect ML? A New Benchmark and Empirical AnalysesVraj Shah, Thomas J. Parashos, Arun KumarVLDB 2024 · 8 citations
