MDBench: Benchmarking Data-Driven Methods for Model Discovery
Amirmohammad Ziaei Bideh, Aleksandra Georgievska, Jonathan Gryak
Abstract
Model discovery aims to uncover governing differential equations of dynamical systems directly from experimental data. Benchmarking such methods is essential for tracking progress and understanding trade-offs in the field. While prior efforts have focused mostly on identifying single equations, typically framed as symbolic regression, there remains a lack of comprehensive benchmarks for discovering dynamical models. To address this, we introduce MDBench, an open-source benchmarking framework for evaluating model discovery methods on dynamical systems. MDBench assesses 12 algorithms on 14 partial differential equations (PDEs) and 63 ordinary differential equations (ODEs) under varying levels of noise. Evaluation metrics include derivative prediction accuracy, model complexity, and equation fidelity. We also introduce seven challenging PDE systems from fluid dynamics and thermodynamics, revealing key limitations in current methods. Our findings illustrate that linear methods and genetic programming methods achieve the lowest prediction error for PDEs and ODEs, respectively. Moreover, linear models are in general more robust against noise. MDBench accelerates the advancement of model discovery methods by offering a rigorous, extensible benchmarking framework and a rich, diverse collection of dynamical system datasets, enabling systematic evaluation, comparison, and improvement of equation accuracy and robustness.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d760df97-c10f-453c-86bc-0a2a7a976a26Builds on9
- Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential EquationsZongyi Li, Nikola Borislavov Kovachki, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Burigede Liu et al.ICLR 2021 · 3,911 citations
- Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientsBrenden K. Petersen, Mikel Landajuela, T. Nathan Mundhenk, Cláudio Prata Santiago et al.ICLR 2021 · 444 citations
- End-to-end Symbolic Regression with TransformersPierre-Alexandre Kamienny, Stéphane d'Ascoli, Guillaume Lample, François ChartonNeurIPS 2022 · 320 citations
- Neural Symbolic Regression that scalesLuca Biggio, Tommaso Bendinelli, Alexander Neitz, Aurélien Lucchi et al.ICML 2021 · 251 citations
- A Unified Framework for Deep Symbolic RegressionMikel Landajuela, Chak Shing Lee, Jiachen Yang, Ruben Glatt et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 160 citations
Related papers
- Symmetry-Informed Governing Equation DiscoveryJianke Yang, Wang Rao, Nima Dehmamy, Robin Walters et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 15 citations
- D-CODE: Discovering Closed-form ODEs from Observed TrajectoriesZhaozhi Qian, Krzysztof Kacprzyk, Mihaela van der SchaarICLR 2022 · 32 citations
- Discovering Ordinary Differential Equations with LLM-Based Qualitative and Quantitative EvaluationSum Kyun Song, Bong Gyun Shin, JaeYong LeeICML 2026
- Mechanistic PDE Networks for Discovery of Governing EquationsAdeel Pervez, Efstratios Gavves, Francesco LocatelloICML 2025
- Discovering Symbolic Partial Differential Equation by Abductive LearningEn-Hao Gao, Cunjing Ge, Yuan Jiang, Zhi-Hua ZhouNeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
