When Grammar Guides the Attack: Uncovering Control-Plane Vulnerabilities in LLMs with Structured Output
Shuoming Zhang, Jiacheng Zhao, Hanyuan Dong, Ruiyuan Xu, Zhicheng Li, Yangyu Zhang, Shuaijiang Li, Yuan Wen, Chunwei Xia, Zheng Wang, Xiaobing Feng, Huimin Cui
Abstract
Content Warning: This paper may contain unsafe or harmful content generated by LLMs that may be offensive to readers. Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly serve as tooling platforms through structured output APIs, but the grammar-guided decoding that powers this feature opens a critical control-plane attack surface orthogonal to traditional data-plane vulnerabilities. We introduce Constrained Decoding Attack (CDA), a new jailbreak class that targets the LLM control plane. CDA is best characterized as a control-to-semantic pipeline: (1) schema-enforced logit masking injects a malicious prefix into the generation trajectory, and (2) the model itself completes the harmful intent. Unlike data-plane jailbreaks that rely on bypassing alignment with visible inputs, CDA acts on the decoding process itself, so internal safety alignment alone cannot stop it. We instantiate CDA with EnumAttack, which hides malicious content in enum fields, and the more evasive DictAttack, which decouples the payload across a benign prompt and a dictionary-based grammar. Across 13 proprietary/open-weight models and five standard benchmarks, DictAttack achieves 94.3--99.5% Attack Success Rate (ASR) on flagship models including gpt-5, gemini-2.5-pro, deepseek-r1, and gpt-oss-120b. While basic grammar auditing mitigates EnumAttack, DictAttack still sustains 75.8% ASR against SOTA jailbreak guardrails, exposing a"semantic gap"that demands cross-plane defenses bridging the data and control planes. Project page and code are available at https://ict-cda.github.io/.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d7495cc6-5e16-4900-86fb-9f0eff871be7Builds on26
- Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?Alexander Wei, Nika Haghtalab, Jacob SteinhardtNeurIPS 2023 · 2,230 citations
- SGLang: Efficient Execution of Structured Language Model ProgramsLianmin Zheng, Liangsheng Yin, Zhiqiang Xie, Chuyue Sun et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 1,586 citations
- HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust RefusalMantas Mazeika, Long Phan, Xuwang Yin, Andy Zou et al.ICML 2024 · 1,031 citations
- Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentionWoosuk Kwon, Zhuohan Li, Siyuan Zhuang, Ying Sheng et al.SOSP 2023 · 1,016 citations
- Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs AutomaticallyAnay Mehrotra, Manolis Zampetakis, Paul Kassianik, Blaine Nelson et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 835 citations
Related papers
- The Trojan Knowledge: Bypassing Commercial LLM Guardrails via Harmless Prompt Weaving and Adaptive Tree SearchRongzhe Wei, Peizhi Niu, Xinjie Shen, Tony Tu et al.ICML 2026 · 5 citations
- URLcoat: Exploiting Web Search Capability to Jailbreak Large Language ModelsYiheng Sun, Linkang Du, Zhou Su, Yuntao Wang et al.S&P 2026
- Efficient LLM Jailbreak via Adaptive Dense-to-sparse Constrained OptimizationKai Hu, Weichen Yu, Yining Li, Tianjun Yao et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 31 citations
- AdvPrefix: An Objective for Nuanced LLM JailbreaksSicheng Zhu, Brandon Amos, Yuandong Tian, Chuan Guo et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 25 citations
- SelfDefend: LLMs Can Defend Themselves against Jailbreaking in a Practical MannerXunguang Wang, Daoyuan Wu, Zhenlan Ji, Zongjie Li et al.USENIX Security 2025
