Coupling Experts and Routers in Mixture-of-Experts via an Auxiliary Loss
Ang Lv, Jin Ma, Yiyuan Ma, Siyuan Qiao
Abstract
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models lack explicit constraints to ensure the router's decisions align well with the experts' capabilities, which ultimately limits model performance. To address this, we propose expert-router coupling (ERC) loss, a lightweight auxiliary loss that tightly couples the router's decisions with expert capabilities. Our approach treats each expert's router embedding as a proxy token for the tokens assigned to that expert, and feeds perturbed router embeddings through the experts to obtain intermediate activations. The ERC loss enforces two constraints on these activations: (1) Each expert must exhibit higher activation for its own proxy token than for the proxy tokens of any other expert. (2) Each proxy token must elicit stronger activation from its corresponding expert than from any other expert. These constraints jointly ensure that each router embedding faithfully represents its corresponding expert's capability, while each expert specializes in processing the tokens actually routed to it. The ERC loss is computationally efficient, operating only on activations, where is the number of experts. This represents a fixed cost independent of batch size, unlike prior coupling methods that scale with the number of tokens (often millions per batch). Through pre-training MoE-LLMs ranging from 3B to 15B parameters and extensive analysis on trillions of tokens, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the ERC loss. Moreover, the ERC loss offers flexible control and quantitative tracking of expert specialization levels during training, providing valuable insights into MoEs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d733b349-80e6-4733-9fa3-b57818807f76Cited by top-tier papers3
- Union-of-Experts: Neurons in Mixture-of-Experts are Secretly RoutersSonghao Wu, Ang Lv, Ruobing Xie, Samm Sun et al.ACL 2026
- -Balancing for Mixture-of-Experts TrainingLizhang Chen, Jonathan Li, Qi Wang, Runlong Liao et al.ICML 2026
- Profiling-Free Mixed-Precision Quantization for MoE LLMs via Fuzzy Rule InterpolationHuachen Qi, Ruiyu Zhuo, Bowen Shi, Xiang Chang et al.ACL 2026
Builds on18
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Supervised Contrastive LearningPrannay Khosla, Piotr Teterwak, Chen Wang, Aaron Sarna et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 7,049 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional Computation and Automatic ShardingDmitry Lepikhin, HyoukJoong Lee, Yuanzhong Xu, Dehao Chen et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,954 citations
Related papers
- Advancing Expert Specialization for Better MoEHongcan Guo, Haolang Lu, Guoshun Nan, Bolun Chu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 48 citations
- Synergistic Intra- and Cross-Layer Regularization Losses for MoE Expert SpecializationRizhen Hu, Yuan Cao, Boao Kong, Mou Sun et al.ICML 2026
- Hierarchical Mixture of Experts with Two-Stage OptimizationGleb Molodtsov, Alexander Miasnikov, Aleksandr BeznosikovKDD 2026 · 2 citations
- Dirichlet-Prior Shaping: Guiding Expert Specialization in Upcycled MoEsLeyla Mirvakhabova, Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi, Gaurav Kumar, Hanxue Liang et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Multilingual Routing in Mixture-of-ExpertsLucas Bandarkar, Chenyuan Yang, Mohsen Fayyaz, Junlin Hu et al.ICLR 2026 · 34 citations
