Training Normalizing Flows with the Information Bottleneck for Competitive Generative Classification
Lynton Ardizzone, Radek Mackowiak, Carsten Rother, Ullrich Köthe
Abstract
The Information Bottleneck (IB) objective uses information theory to formulate a task-performance versus robustness trade-off. It has been successfully applied in the standard discriminative classification setting. We pose the question whether the IB can also be used to train generative likelihood models such as normalizing flows. Since normalizing flows use invertible network architectures (INNs), they are information-preserving by construction. This seems contradictory to the idea of a bottleneck. In this work, firstly, we develop the theory and methodology of IB-INNs, a class of conditional normalizing flows where INNs are trained using the IB objective: Introducing a small amount of controlled information loss allows for an asymptotically exact formulation of the IB, while keeping the INN's generative capabilities intact. Secondly, we investigate the properties of these models experimentally, specifically used as generative classifiers. This model class offers advantages such as improved uncertainty quantification and out-of-distribution detection, but traditional generative classifier solutions suffer considerably in classification accuracy. We find the trade-off parameter in the IB controls a mix of generative capabilities and accuracy close to standard classifiers. Empirically, our uncertainty estimates in this mixed regime compare favourably to conventional generative and discriminative classifiers.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d6f590f4-44b5-49e4-bee6-0f3385f4d8c6Cited by top-tier papers19
- CARD: Classification and Regression Diffusion ModelsXizewen Han, Huangjie Zheng, Mingyuan ZhouNeurIPS 2022 · 185 citations
- GMMSeg: Gaussian Mixture based Generative Semantic Segmentation ModelsChen Liang, Wenguan Wang, Jiaxu Miao, Yi YangNeurIPS 2022 · 185 citations
- On the Practicality of Deterministic Epistemic UncertaintyJanis Postels, Mattia Segù, Tao Sun, Luca Daniel Sieber et al.ICML 2022 · 76 citations
- JEM++: Improved Techniques for Training JEMXiulong Yang, Shihao JiICCV 2021 · 36 citations
- Mutual Information Estimation via Normalizing FlowsIvan Butakov, Aleksander Tolmachev, Sofia Malanchuk, Anna Neopryatnaya et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 30 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Enhancing Multiple Reliability Measures via Nuisance-Extended Information BottleneckJongheon Jeong, Sihyun Yu, Hankook Lee, Jinwoo ShinCVPR 2023
- A Rate-Distortion View of Uncertainty QuantificationIfigeneia Apostolopoulou, Benjamin Eysenbach, Frank Nielsen, Artur DubrawskiICML 2024 · 3 citations
- Understanding the Limitations of Conditional Generative ModelsEthan Fetaya, Jörn-Henrik Jacobsen, Will Grathwohl, Richard S. ZemelICLR 2020 · 65 citations
- Composing Normalizing Flows for Inverse ProblemsJay Whang, Erik M. Lindgren, Alex DimakisICML 2021 · 56 citations
- Disentangled Information BottleneckZiqi Pan, Li Niu, Jianfu Zhang, Liqing ZhangAAAI 2021 · 55 citations
