Does Data Scaling Lead to Visual Compositional Generalization?
Arnas Uselis, Andrea Dittadi, Seong Joon Oh
Abstract
Compositional understanding is crucial for human intelligence, yet it remains unclear whether contemporary vision models exhibit it. The dominant machine learning paradigm is built on the premise that scaling data and model sizes will improve out-of-distribution performance, including compositional generalization. We test this premise through controlled experiments that systematically vary data scale, concept diversity, and combination coverage. We find that compositional generalization is driven by data diversity, not mere data scale. Increased combinatorial coverage forces models to discover a linearly factored representational structure, where concepts decompose into additive components. We prove this structure is key to efficiency, enabling perfect generalization from few observed combinations. Evaluating pretrained models (DINO, CLIP), we find above-random yet imperfect performance, suggesting partial presence of this structure. Our work motivates stronger emphasis on constructing diverse datasets for compositional generalization, and considering the importance of representational structure that enables efficient compositional learning. github.com/oshapio/visual-compositional-generalization
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d6c5fdc8-6e56-4770-853d-7c96c3b09943Cited by top-tier papers9
- CLIP Behaves like a Bag-of-Words Model Cross-modally but not Uni-modallyDarina Koishigarina, Arnas Uselis, Seong Joon OhICLR 2026 · 33 citations
- On the rankability of visual embeddingsAnkit Sonthalia, Arnas Uselis, Seong Joon OhNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Left–Right Symmetry Breaking in CLIP-Style Vision-Language Models Trained on Synthetic Spatial-Relation DataTakaki Yamamoto, Chihiro Noguchi, Toshihiro TanizawaICML 2026
- When Do Diffusion Models Learn to Generate Multiple Objects?Yujin Jeong, Arnas Uselis, Iro Laina, Seong Joon Oh et al.ICML 2026
- Necessary Conditions for Compositional Generalization of Embedding ModelsArnas Uselis, Andrea Dittadi, Seong Joon OhICML 2026
Builds on30
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision TransformersMathilde Caron, Hugo Touvron, Ishan Misra, Hervé Jégou et al.ICCV 2021 · 8,921 citations
- A causal view of compositional zero-shot recognitionYuval Atzmon, Felix Kreuk, Uri Shalit, Gal ChechikNeurIPS 2020 · 163 citations
- Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMsShengbang Tong, Zhuang Liu, Yuexiang Zhai, Yi Ma et al.CVPR 2024 · 111 citations
Related papers
- When and How Does CLIP Enable Domain and Compositional Generalization?Elias Kempf, Simon Schrodi, Max Argus, Thomas BroxICML 2025
- Are Object-Centric Representations Better at Compositional Generalization?Ferdinand Kapl, Amir Mohammad Karimi Mamaghan, Maximilian Seitzer, Karl Johansson et al.ICML 2026
- How Do In-Context Examples Affect Compositional Generalization?Shengnan An, Zeqi Lin, Qiang Fu, Bei Chen et al.ACL 2023 · 15 citations
- When does compositional structure yield compositional generalization? A kernel theorySamuel Lippl, Kim StachenfeldICLR 2025
- Compositional Generalization from First PrinciplesThaddäus Wiedemer, Prasanna Mayilvahanan, Matthias Bethge, Wieland BrendelNeurIPS 2023 · 78 citations
