Printed Machine Learning Classifiers
Muhammad Husnain Mubarik, Dennis D. Weller, Nathaniel Bleier, Matthew Tomei, Jasmin Aghassi-Hagmann, Mehdi B. Tahoori, Rakesh Kumar
Abstract
A large number of application domains have requirements on cost, conformity, and non-toxicity that silicon-based computing systems cannot meet, but that may be met by printed electronics. For several of these domains, a typical computational task to be performed is classification. In this work, we explore the hardware cost of inference engines for popular classification algorithms (Multi-Layer Perceptrons, Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Logistic Regression, Random Forests and Binary Decision Trees) in EGT and CNT-TFT printed technologies and determine that Decision Trees and SVMs provide a good balance between accuracy and cost. We evaluate conventional Decision Tree and SVM architectures in these technologies and conclude that their area and power overhead must be reduced. We explore, through SPICE and gate-level hardware simulations and multiple working prototypes, several classifier architectures that exploit the unique cost and implementation tradeoffs in printed technologies - a) Bespoke printed classifers that are customized to a model generated for a given application using specific training datasets, b) Lookup-based printed classifiers where key hardware computations are replaced by lookup tables, and c) Analog printed classifiers where some classifier components are replaced by their analog equivalents. Our evaluations show that bespoke implementation of EGT printed Decision Trees has 48.9× lower area (average) and 75.6× lower power (average) than their conventional equivalents; corresponding benefits for bespoke SVMs are 12.8× and Decision outperform 12.7× respectively. Lookup-based Trees their non-lookup bespoke equivalents by 38% and 70%; lookup-based SVMs are better by 8% and 0.6%. Analog printed Decision Trees provide 437× area and 27× power benefits over digital bespoke counterparts; analog SVMs yield 490× area and 12× power improvements. Our results and prototypes demonstrate feasibility of fabricating and deploying battery and self-powered printed classifiers in the application domains of interest.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- SpAtten: Efficient Sparse Attention Architecture with Cascade Token and Head PruningHanrui Wang, Zhekai Zhang, Song HanHPCA 2021 · 412 citations
- Lifetime-Aware Design for Item-Level Intelligence at the Extreme EdgeShvetank Prakash, Andrew Cheng, Olof Kindgren, Ashiq Ahamed et al.ASPLOS 2026 · 1 citation
- Hardwired-Neuron Language Processing Units as General-Purpose Cognitive SubstratesYang Liu, Yi Chen, Yongwei Zhao, Yifan Hao et al.ASPLOS 2026
Builds on1
Related papers
- Power-Constrained Printed Neuromorphic Hardware TrainingTara Gheshlaghi, Haibin Zhao, Priyanjana Pal, Michael Hefenbrock et al.DAC 2025
- Symbolic Regression Enhanced Decision Trees for Classification TasksKei Sen Fong, Mehul MotaniAAAI 2024 · 12 citations
- A digital 3D TCAM accelerator for the inference phase of Random ForestChieh-Lin Tsai, Chun-Feng Wu, Yuan-Hao Chang, Han-Wen Hu et al.DAC 2023 · 6 citations
- Oblivious Multi-Party Machine Learning on Trusted ProcessorsOlga Ohrimenko, Felix Schuster, Cédric Fournet, Aastha Mehta et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 594 citations
- Order-Preserving Cryptography for the Confidential Inference in Random Forests: FPGA Design and ImplementationRupesh Raj Karn, Kashif Nawaz, Ibrahim Abe M. ElfadelDAC 2024 · 3 citations
