SPRINT: Enabling Interleaved Planning and Parallelized Execution in Reasoning Models
Emil Biju, Shayan Talaei, Zhemin Huang, Mohammadreza Pourreza, Azalia Mirhoseini, Amin Saberi
Abstract
Large reasoning models (LRMs) excel at complex reasoning tasks but typically generate lengthy sequential chains-of-thought, resulting in long inference times before arriving at the final answer. To address this challenge, we introduce SPRINT, a novel post-training and inference-time framework designed to enable LRMs to dynamically identify and exploit opportunities for parallelization during their reasoning process. SPRINT incorporates an innovative data curation pipeline that reorganizes natural language reasoning trajectories into structured rounds of long-horizon planning and parallel execution. By fine-tuning LRMs on a small amount of such curated data, the models learn to dynamically identify independent subtasks within extended reasoning processes and effectively execute them in parallel. Through extensive evaluations, we demonstrate that models fine-tuned with the SPRINT framework match the performance of reasoning models on complex domains such as mathematics while generating up to 39% fewer sequential tokens on problems requiring more than 8,000 output tokens. Finally, we observe consistent results transferred to two out-of-distribution tasks, namely GPQA and Countdown, with up to 45% and 65% reduction in average sequential tokens respectively for longer reasoning trajectories, while matching the performance of the fine-tuned reasoning model.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d675b2ea-9a11-4774-8fe2-96cd54da5e02Builds on23
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMsTim Dettmers, Artidoro Pagnoni, Ari Holtzman, Luke ZettlemoyerNeurIPS 2023 · 5,863 citations
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
Related papers
- SAT: Balancing Reasoning Accuracy and Efficiency with Stepwise Adaptive ThinkingWeiyang Huang, Xuefeng Bai, Kehai Chen, Xinyang Chen et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
- SuCo: Sufficiency-guided Continuous Adaptive ReasoningJiahao Wang, Bingyu Liang, Chenhao Hu, Longhui Zhang et al.ICML 2026
- Teaching Language Models to Reason with ToolsChengpeng Li, Zhengyang Tang, Ziniu Li, Mingfeng Xue et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
- Rethinking LLM Reasoning: From Explicit Trajectories to Latent RepresentationsCong Jiang, Xiaofeng Zhang, Fangzhi Zhu, XiaoWei Chen et al.ICLR 2026
- Let LRMs Break Free from Overthinking via Self-Braking TuningHaoran Zhao, Yuchen Yan, Yongliang Shen, Haolei Xu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 31 citations
