SuCo: Sufficiency-guided Continuous Adaptive Reasoning
Jiahao Wang, Bingyu Liang, Chenhao Hu, Longhui Zhang, Xuebo Liu, Min zhang, Jing Li, Xuelong Li
Abstract
Despite remarkable performance on complex tasks, Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) often generate excessively long Chain-of-Thoughts (CoT), inflating computational costs even for simple queries. Existing efforts to mitigate this inefficiency typically rely on discrete reasoning modes or fixed budget tiers, lacking a principled criterion of when reasoning is sufficient. In this work, we introduce Minimal Sufficient CoT (MSC), defined as the shortest prefix of a CoT trajectory which is adequate for producing the correct answer. We empirically show that MSC not only reduces reasoning tokens, but also improves accuracy across difficulty levels. Building on MSC, we propose Sufficiency-guided Continuous Adaptive Reasoning (SuCo), a two-stage training framework for autonomous reasoning control along a continuous spectrum. In stage 1, MSC-Aligned Fine-Tuning (MFT) constructs MSC data using problem-adaptive sufficiency thresholds that naturally scale with question difficulty, then fine-tunes the model to internalize concise yet sufficient reasoning patterns. In stage 2, Sufficiency-Aware Policy Optimization (SAPO) further optimizes the model through reinforcement learning with dynamic complexity tracking and sufficiency-aware rewards that penalize both over- and under-thinking. Extensive experiments across mathematics, code, and science benchmarks show that SuCo consistently achieves improvements in both accuracy and reasoning efficiency.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 41cd2968-d402-4528-9441-cd3f4daed849Builds on12
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao et al.ICLR 2024 · 2,082 citations
- Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models BetterKatherine Lee, Daphne Ippolito, Andrew Nystrom, Chiyuan Zhang et al.ACL 2022 · 844 citations
Related papers
- Incentivizing Dual Process Thinking for Efficient Large Language Model ReasoningXiaoxue Cheng, Junyi Li, Zhenduo Zhang, Xinyu Tang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 25 citations
- ARM: Adaptive Reasoning ModelSiye Wu, Jian Xie, Yikai Zhang, Aili Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 31 citations
- MuTIS: Enhancing Reasoning Efficiency through Multi Turn Intervention Sampling in Reinforcement LearningWenshuo Zhao, Haoxing Zhai, Xinyu Qiu, Zhenting Qi et al.EMNLP 2025 · 3 citations
- Think Better, Not Longer: Token-Level Marginal Utility for Efficient Reasoning in Large Reasoning ModelsJiawei Li, Yang Gao, Huashan Sun, Chong FengACL 2026
- Your Reasoning Model Knows What Counts: Self-Guided Chain-of-Thought Pruning for Efficient ReasoningZi-Ao Ma, Xian-Ling Mao, Tian Lan, Chen Xu et al.ACL 2026
