I3: Intent-Introspective Retrieval Conditioned on Instructions
Kaihang Pan, Juncheng Li, Wenjie Wang, Hao Fei, Hongye Song, Wei Ji, Jun Lin, Xiaozhong Liu, Tat-Seng Chua, Siliang Tang
Abstract
Recent studies indicate that dense retrieval models struggle to perform well on a wide variety of retrieval tasks that lack dedicated training data, as different retrieval tasks often entail distinct search intents. To address this challenge, in this work we leverage instructions to flexibly describe retrieval intents and introduce I3, a unified retrieval system that performs Intent-Introspective retrieval across various tasks, conditioned on Instructions without any task-specific training. I3 innovatively incorporates a pluggable introspector in a parameter-isolated manner to comprehend specific retrieval intents by jointly reasoning over the input query and instruction, and seamlessly integrates the introspected intent into the original retrieval model for intent-aware retrieval. Furthermore, we propose progressively-pruned intent learning. It utilizes extensive LLM-generated data to train I3 phase-by-phase, embodying two key designs: progressive structure pruning and drawback extrapolation-based data refinement. Extensive experiments show that in the BEIR benchmark, I3 significantly outperforms baseline methods designed with task-specific retrievers, achieving state-of-the-art zero-shot performance without any task-specific tuning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d596207a-d678-4baa-83d9-c90074930858Cited by top-tier papers2
- VideoStir: Understanding Long Videos via Spatio-Temporally Structured and Intent-Aware RAGHonghao Fu, Miao Xu, Yiwei Wang, Dailing Zhang et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
- What Limits Virtual Agent Application? OmniBench: A Scalable Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Essential Virtual Agent CapabilitiesWendong Bu, Yang Wu, Qifan Yu, Minghe Gao et al.ICML 2025
Builds on18
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Adding Conditional Control to Text-to-Image Diffusion ModelsLvmin Zhang, Anyi Rao, Maneesh AgrawalaICCV 2023 · 6,759 citations
- Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text RetrievalLee Xiong, Chenyan Xiong, Ye Li, Kwok-Fung Tang et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,547 citations
- ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERTOmar Khattab, Matei ZahariaSIGIR 2020 · 1,246 citations
Related papers
- ZeroGR: A Generalizable and Scalable Framework for Zero-Shot Generative RetrievalWeiwei Sun, Keyi Kong, Xinyu Ma, Shuaiqiang Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- HypeR: Multitask Hyper-Prompted Training Enables Large-Scale Retrieval GeneralizationZefeng Cai, Chongyang Tao, Tao Shen, Can Xu et al.ICLR 2023
- Augmentation-Adapted Retriever Improves Generalization of Language Models as Generic Plug-InZichun Yu, Chenyan Xiong, Shi Yu, Zhiyuan LiuACL 2023 · 15 citations
- COCO-DR: Combating the Distribution Shift in Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval with Contrastive and Distributionally Robust LearningYue Yu, Chenyan Xiong, Si Sun, Chao Zhang et al.EMNLP 2022 · 21 citations
- Retrv-MoE: Scaling Unified Multimodal Retrieval with Sparse Mixture-of-ExpertsTongxu Lin, Jiayin XiaoKDD 2026
