Two-sided Competing Matching Recommendation Markets With Quota and Complementary Preferences Constraints
Yuantong Li, Guang Cheng, Xiaowu Dai
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a new recommendation algorithm for addressing the problem of two-sided online matching markets with complementary preferences and quota constraints, where agents' preferences are unknown a priori and must be learned from data. The presence of mixed quota and complementary preferences constraints can lead to instability in the matching process, making this problem challenging to solve. To overcome this challenge, we formulate the problem as a bandit learning framework and propose the Multi-agent Multi-type Thompson Sampling (MMTS) algorithm. The algorithm combines the strengths of Thompson Sampling for exploration with a new double matching technique to provide a stable matching outcome. Our theoretical analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of MMTS as it can achieve stability and has a total -Bayesian regret with high probability, which exhibits linearity with respect to the total firm's quota , the square root of the maximum size of available type workers and time horizon . In addition, simulation studies also demonstrate MMTS's effectiveness in various settings. We provide code used in our experiments https://github.com/Likelyt/Double-Matching.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d57a2e66-5653-4fac-8dca-9446215d2f6cCited by top-tier papers4
- Putting Gale & Shapley to Work: Guaranteeing Stability Through LearningHadi Hosseini, Sanjukta Roy, Duohan ZhangNeurIPS 2024 · 14 citations
- Incentivized Exploration with Stochastic Covariates: A Two-Stage Mechanism Design for Recommender SystemYuantong Li, Guang Cheng, Xiaowu DaiICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Decentralized Bandits without Global Clock for Dynamic Matching MarketMengtong Gao, Zhenhe Zhang, Jichen Li, Wentao Zhou et al.ICML 2026
- Bandit Learning in Matching Markets with IndifferenceFang Kong, Jingqi Tang, Mingzhu Li, Pinyan Lu et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on7
- What is Local Optimality in Nonconvex-Nonconcave Minimax Optimization?Chi Jin, Praneeth Netrapalli, Michael I. JordanICML 2020 · 381 citations
- Learning Equilibria in Matching Markets from Bandit FeedbackMeena Jagadeesan, Alexander Wei, Yixin Wang, Michael I. Jordan et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 52 citations
- Beyond log2(T) regret for decentralized bandits in matching marketsSoumya Basu, Karthik Abinav Sankararaman, Abishek SankararamanICML 2021 · 45 citations
- Learn to Match with No Regret: Reinforcement Learning in Markov Matching MarketsYifei Min, Tianhao Wang, Ruitu Xu, Zhaoran Wang et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 31 citations
- Learning in Multi-Stage Decentralized Matching MarketsXiaowu Dai, Michael I. JordanNeurIPS 2021 · 21 citations
Related papers
- Improved Analysis for Bandit Learning in Matching MarketsFang Kong, Zilong Wang, Shuai LiNeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations
- Stable Matching with Ties: Approximation Ratios and LearningShiyun Lin, Simon Mauras, Nadav Merlis, Vianney PerchetNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Queueing Matching Bandits with Preference FeedbackJung-hun Kim, Min-hwan OhNeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations
- Player-optimal Stable Regret for Bandit Learning in Matching MarketsFang Kong, Shuai LiSODA 2023 · 6 citations
- Improved Bandits in Many-to-One Matching Markets with Incentive CompatibilityFang Kong, Shuai LiAAAI 2024 · 10 citations
