Bandit Learning in Matching Markets with Indifference
Fang Kong, Jingqi Tang, Mingzhu Li, Pinyan Lu, John C. S. Lui, Shuai Li
Abstract
A rich line of recent works studies how participants in matching markets learn their unknown preferences through iterative interactions with each other. The two sides of participants in the market can be respectively formulated as players and arms in the bandit problem. To ensure market stability, the objective is to minimize the stable regret of each player. Though existing works provide significant theoretical upper bounds for players' stable regret, the results heavily rely on the assumption that each participant has a strict preference ranking. However, in real applications, multiple candidates (e.g., workers in the labor market and students in school admission) usually demonstrate comparable performance levels, making it challenging for participants (e.g., employers and schools) to differentiate and rank their preferences. To deal with the potential indifferent preferences, we propose an adaptive exploration algorithm based on arm-guided Gale-Shapley (AE-AGS). We show that its stable regret is of order O(N K log T /∆ 2 ), where N is the number of players, K the number of arms, T the total time horizon, and ∆ the minimum non-zero preference gap. Extensive experiments demonstrate the algorithm's effectiveness in handling such complex situations and its consistent superiority over baselines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f16c1813-b00e-46af-be19-97193e68f102Cited by top-tier papers3
- Stable Matching with Ties: Approximation Ratios and LearningShiyun Lin, Simon Mauras, Nadav Merlis, Vianney PerchetNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Adaptive Bandit Algorithms for Contextual Matching MarketsShiyun Lin, Simon Mauras, Vianney Perchet, Nadav MerlisICML 2026
- Bandit Learning in Matching Markets Robust to Adversarial CorruptionsZheshun Wu, Jinhang Zuo, Zenglin Xu, Fang KongICLR 2026
Builds on9
- Beyond log2(T) regret for decentralized bandits in matching marketsSoumya Basu, Karthik Abinav Sankararaman, Abishek SankararamanICML 2021 · 45 citations
- Decentralized, Communication- and Coordination-free Learning in Structured Matching MarketsChinmay Maheshwari, Shankar Sastry, Eric MazumdarNeurIPS 2022 · 22 citations
- Matching in Multi-arm Bandit with CollisionYirui Zhang, Siwei Wang, Zhixuan FangNeurIPS 2022 · 18 citations
- Putting Gale & Shapley to Work: Guaranteeing Stability Through LearningHadi Hosseini, Sanjukta Roy, Duohan ZhangNeurIPS 2024 · 14 citations
- Improved Bandits in Many-to-One Matching Markets with Incentive CompatibilityFang Kong, Shuai LiAAAI 2024 · 10 citations
Related papers
- Improved Analysis for Bandit Learning in Matching MarketsFang Kong, Zilong Wang, Shuai LiNeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations
- Player-optimal Stable Regret for Bandit Learning in Matching MarketsFang Kong, Shuai LiSODA 2023 · 6 citations
- Decentralized Bandits without Global Clock for Dynamic Matching MarketMengtong Gao, Zhenhe Zhang, Jichen Li, Wentao Zhou et al.ICML 2026
- Competing Bandits in Matching Markets via Super StabilitySoumya BasuICML 2025
- Bandit Learning in Housing MarketsShiyun LinAAAI 2026
