Lune

ACL Findings2026

RiT: Rubrics-in-Thinking Reinforcement Learning for Improved Reasoning in Large Language Models

Xiaobin Tian, Shuai Yuan, Muyun Ding, Haonan Chen, Xiaoxi Jiang

Abstract

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) benefit from generating intermediate reasoning steps, enabling more reliable and interpretable decisionmaking. While outcome-based supervision has proven effective for LRMs across diverse tasks, it focuses solely on final answers and cannot guarantee high-quality intermediate reasoning. In contrast, existing process supervision is largely limited to verifiable domains such as mathematics or code, where intermediate steps can be explicitly checked, restricting its applicability to open-ended reasoning tasks. To address these limitations, we propose Rubrics-in-Thinking Reinforcement Learning (RiT), the first framework to introduce thinkingrubric supervision into intermediate reasoning. RiT automatically generates fine-grained rubrics and integrates them into a reward function via gated fusion with outcome-based rewards, guiding models to reason in a coherent and task-aligned manner, improving both intermediate steps and the final response. Experiments on reasoning-intensive and open-ended benchmarks demonstrate that RiT consistently outperforms outcome-only RL baselines.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Builds on18

  1. Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
  2. TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
  3. DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at ScaleQiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2,828 citations
  4. G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using Gpt-4 with Better Human AlignmentYang Liu, Dan Iter, Yichong Xu, Shuohang Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 549 citations
  5. Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable DomainsAnisha Gunjal, Anthony Wang, Elaine Lau, Vaskar Nath et al.ICLR 2026 · 340 citations

Related papers

  1. AutoRubric: Rubric-Based Generative Rewards for Faithful Multimodal ReasoningMengzhao Jia, Zhihan Zhang, Ignacio Cases, Zheyuan Liu et al.ACL Findings 2026
  2. LeTS: Learning to Think-and-Search via Process-and-Outcome Reward HybridizationQi Zhang, Shouqing Yang, Lirong Gao, Hao Chen et al.EMNLP 2025
  3. Beyond Outcome Verification: Verifiable Process Reward Models for Structured ReasoningMassimiliano Pronesti, Anya Belz, Yufang HouACL Findings 2026
  4. Breaking the Exploration Bottleneck: Rubric-Scaffolded Reinforcement Learning for Open-Ended LLM ReasoningYang Zhou, Sunzhu Li, Shunyu Liu, Wenkai Fang et al.ICML 2026 · 44 citations
  5. Reward and Guidance through Rubrics: Promoting Exploration to Improve Multi-Domain ReasoningBaolong Bi, Shenghua Liu, Yiwei Wang, Siqian Tong et al.ICML 2026 · 19 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines