Breaking the Exploration Bottleneck: Rubric-Scaffolded Reinforcement Learning for Open-Ended LLM Reasoning
Yang Zhou, Sunzhu Li, Shunyu Liu, Wenkai Fang, Kongcheng Zhang, Jiale Zhao, Jingwen Yang, Yihe Zhou, Jianwei Lv, Tongya Zheng, Hengtong Lu, Chen Wei
Abstract
Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have underscored the potential of Reinforcement Learning (RL) to facilitate the emergence of reasoning capabilities. Despite the encouraging results, a fundamental dilemma persists as RL improvement relies on learning from high-quality samples, yet the exploration for such samples remains bounded by the inherent limitations of LLMs. This, in effect, creates an undesirable cycle in which what cannot be explored cannot be learned. In this work, we propose Rubric-Scaffolded Reinforcement Learning (RuscaRL), a novel instructional scaffolding framework designed to break the exploration bottleneck for open-ended reasoning. Specifically, RuscaRL introduces checklist-style rubrics as (1) explicit scaffolding for exploration during rollout generation, where different rubrics are provided as external guidance within task instructions to steer diverse high-quality responses. This guidance is gradually decayed over time, encouraging the model to internalize the underlying reasoning patterns; (2) verifiable rewards for exploitation during model training, where we can obtain robust LLM-as-a-Judge scores using rubrics as references, enabling effective RL on open-ended reasoning tasks. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of the proposed RuscaRL across various benchmarks, effectively expanding reasoning boundaries under the Best-of-N evaluation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 606d0a91-4e06-419a-92fd-588ba7f0c974Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on29
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
Related papers
- Experience is the Best Teacher: Motivating Effective Exploration in Reinforcement Learning for LLMsWenjian Zhang, Kongcheng Zhang, Jiaxin Qi, Jianqiang Huang et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- RuCL: Stratified Rubric-Based Curriculum Learning for Multimodal Large Language Model ReasoningYukun Chen, Jiaming Li, Longze Chen, Ze Gong et al.ICML 2026 · 5 citations
- Reward and Guidance through Rubrics: Promoting Exploration to Improve Multi-Domain ReasoningBaolong Bi, Shenghua Liu, Yiwei Wang, Siqian Tong et al.ICML 2026 · 19 citations
- QuRL: Rubrics As Judge For Open-Ended Question AnsweringXiyu Wei, Qingwei Zong, Xiaoguang Li, Eugene J. Yu et al.ICLR 2026
- Supervised Reinforcement Learning: From Expert Trajectories to Step-wise ReasoningYihe Deng, I-Hung Hsu, Jun Yan, Zifeng Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 11 citations
