GameArena: Evaluating LLM Reasoning through Live Computer Games
Lanxiang Hu, Qiyu Li, Anze Xie, Nan Jiang, Ion Stoica, Haojian Jin, Hao Zhang
Abstract
Evaluating the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) is challenging. Existing benchmarks often depend on static datasets, which are vulnerable to data contamination and may get saturated over time, or on binary live human feedback that conflates reasoning with other abilities. As the most prominent dynamic benchmark, Chatbot Arena evaluates open-ended questions in real-world settings, but lacks the granularity in assessing specific reasoning capabilities. We introduce GameArena, a dynamic benchmark designed to evaluate LLM reasoning capabilities through interactive gameplay with humans. GameArena consists of three games designed to test specific reasoning capabilities (e.g., deductive and inductive reasoning), while keeping participants entertained and engaged. We analyze the gaming data retrospectively to uncover the underlying reasoning processes of LLMs and measure their fine-grained reasoning capabilities. We collect over 2000 game sessions and provide detailed assessments of various reasoning capabilities for five state-of-the-art LLMs. Our user study with 100 participants suggests that GameArena improves user engagement compared to Chatbot Arena. For the first time, GameArena enables the collection of step-by-step LLM reasoning data in the wild. Our code is available at https://github.com/lmgame-org .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d47aa88d-5ec2-418d-a903-b429f93feba3Cited by top-tier papers4
- lmgame-Bench: How Good are LLMs at Playing Games?Lanxiang Hu, Mingjia Huo, Yuxuan Zhang, Haoyang Yu et al.ICLR 2026 · 47 citations
- Superficial Self-Improved Reasoners Benefit from Model MergingXiangchi Yuan, Chunhui Zhang, Zheyuan Liu, Dachuan Shi et al.EMNLP 2025 · 15 citations
- GuessArena: Guess Who I Am? A Self-Adaptive Framework for Evaluating LLMs in Domain-Specific Knowledge and ReasoningQingchen Yu, Zifan Zheng, Ding Chen, Simin Niu et al.ACL 2025 · 5 citations
- JudgeBoard: Benchmarking and Enhancing Small Language Models for Reasoning EvaluationZhenyu Bi, Gaurav Srivastava, Yang Li, Swastik Roy et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on13
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human PreferenceWei-Lin Chiang, Lianmin Zheng, Ying Sheng, Anastasios Nikolas Angelopoulos et al.ICML 2024 · 1,212 citations
- Benchmarking the Spectrum of Agent CapabilitiesDanijar HafnerICLR 2022 · 193 citations
- DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into State-of-the-Art PipelinesOmar Khattab, Arnav Singhvi, Paridhi Maheshwari, Zhiyuan Zhang et al.ICLR 2024 · 170 citations
Related papers
- GAMEBoT: Transparent Assessment of LLM Reasoning in GamesWenye Lin, Jonathan Roberts, Yunhan Yang, Samuel Albanie et al.ACL 2025 · 12 citations
- ChessArena: A Chess Testbed for Evaluating Strategic Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language ModelsJincheng Liu, Sijun He, Jingjing Wu, Xiangsen Wang et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- GTBench: Uncovering the Strategic Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs via Game-Theoretic EvaluationsJinhao Duan, Renming Zhang, James Diffenderfer, Bhavya Kailkhura et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 79 citations
- GeoArena: Evaluating Open-World Geographic Reasoning in Large Vision-Language ModelsPengyue Jia, Yingyi Zhang, Xiangyu Zhao, Sharon LiACL 2026 · 3 citations
- MME-Reasoning: A Broad-Spectrum Benchmark for Evaluating Logical Reasoning in MLLMsJiakang Yuan, Tianshuo Peng, Yilei Jiang, Yiting Lu et al.ICML 2026
