On (Random-order) Online Contention Resolution Schemes for the Matching Polytope of (Bipartite) Graphs
Calum MacRury, Will Ma, Nathaniel Grammel
Abstract
We present new results for online contention resolution schemes for the matching polytope of graphs, in the random-order (RCRS) and adversarial (OCRS) arrival models. Our results include improved selectability guarantees (i.e., lower bounds), as well as new impossibility results (i.e., upper bounds). By well-known reductions to the prophet (secretary) matching problem, a c-selectable OCRS (RCRS) implies a c-competitive algorithm for adversarial (random order) edge arrivals. Similar reductions are also known for the query-commit matching problem. For the adversarial arrival model, we present a new analysis of the OCRS of Ezra et al. (EC, 2020). We show that this scheme is 0.344-selectable for general graphs and 0.349-selectable for bipartite graphs, improving on the previous 0.337 selectability result for this algorithm. We also show that the selectability of this scheme cannot be greater than 0.361 for general graphs and 0.382 for bipartite graphs. We further show that no OCRS can achieve a selectability greater than 0.4 for general graphs, and 0.433 for bipartite graphs. For random-order arrivals, we present two attenuation-based schemes which use new attenuation functions. Our first RCRS is 0.474-selectable for general graphs, and our second is 0.476-selectable for bipartite graphs. These results improve upon the recent 0.45 (and 0.456) selectability results for general graphs (respectively, bipartite graphs) due to Pollner et al. (EC, 2022). On general graphs, our 0.474-selectable RCRS provides the best known positive result even for offline contention resolution, and also for the correlation gap. We conclude by proving a fundamental upper bound of 0.5 on the selectability of RCRS, using bipartite graphs. * The full version of the paper can be accessed at https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.07520
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d3d9279c-3281-4166-86de-4d7a0c2d5170Cited by top-tier papers5
- Improved Guarantees for Offline Stochastic Matching via new Ordered Contention Resolution SchemesBrian Brubach, Nathaniel Grammel, Will Ma, Aravind SrinivasanNeurIPS 2021 · 26 citations
- Random-Order Contention Resolution via Continuous Induction: Tightness for Bipartite Matching under Vertex ArrivalsCalum MacRury, Will MaSTOC 2024 · 3 citations
- Nearly Tight Sample Complexity for Matroid Online Contention ResolutionMoran Feldman, Ola Svensson, Rico ZenklusenSODA 2026 · 1 citation
- Fair Matroid SelectionKiarash Banihashem, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, Danny MittalNeurIPS 2025
- Optimal Rounding for Two-Stage Bipartite MatchingTristan Pollner, Amin Saberi, Anders WikumSODA 2026
Builds on3
- Improved Guarantees for Offline Stochastic Matching via new Ordered Contention Resolution SchemesBrian Brubach, Nathaniel Grammel, Will Ma, Aravind SrinivasanNeurIPS 2021 · 26 citations
- Tight Guarantees for Multi-unit Prophet Inequalities and Online Stochastic KnapsackJiashuo Jiang, Will Ma, Jiawei ZhangSODA 2022 · 20 citations
- Random-Order Contention Resolution via Continuous Induction: Tightness for Bipartite Matching under Vertex ArrivalsCalum MacRury, Will MaSTOC 2024 · 3 citations
Related papers
- Online Weighted Matching with a SampleHaim Kaplan, David Naori, Danny RazSODA 2022 · 14 citations
- Simple and Optimal Greedy Online Contention Resolution SchemesVasilis LivanosNeurIPS 2022 · 1 citation
- Multiway Online Correlated SelectionGuy Blanc, Moses CharikarFOCS 2021 · 16 citations
- Fully Dynamic Online Selection through Online Contention Resolution SchemesVashist Avadhanula, Andrea Celli, Riccardo Colini-Baldeschi, Stefano Leonardi et al.AAAI 2023 · 1 citation
- Online Selection Problems against Constrained AdversaryZhihao Jiang, Pinyan Lu, Zhihao Gavin Tang, Yuhao ZhangICML 2021 · 16 citations
