Random-Order Contention Resolution via Continuous Induction: Tightness for Bipartite Matching under Vertex Arrivals
Calum MacRury, Will Ma
Abstract
We introduce a new approach for designing Random-order Contention Resolution Schemes (RCRS’s) via exact solution in continuous time. Given a function c(y):[0,1] → [0,1], we show how to select each element which arrives at time y ∈ [0,1] with probability exactly c(y). We provide a rigorous algorithmic framework for achieving this, which discretizes the time interval and also needs to sample its past execution to ensure these exact selection probabilities. We showcase our framework in the context of online contention resolution schemes for matching with random-order vertex arrivals. For bipartite graphs with two-sided arrivals, we design a (1+e−2)/2 ≈ 0.567-selectable RCRS, which we also show to be tight. Next, we show that the presence of short odd-length cycles is the only barrier to attaining a (tight) (1+e−2)/2-selectable RCRS on general graphs. By generalizing our bipartite RCRS, we design an RCRS for graphs with odd-length girth g which is (1+ e−2)/2-selectable as g → ∞. This convergence happens very rapidly: for triangle-free graphs (i.e., g ≥ 5), we attain a 121/240 + 7/16 e2 ≈ 0.563-selectable RCRS. Finally, for general graphs we improve on the 8/15 ≈ 0.533-selectable RCRS of (Fu et al., 2021) and design an RCRS which is at least 0.535-selectable. Due to the reduction of (Ezra et al., 2020), our bounds yield a 0.535-competitive (respectively, (1+ e−2)/2-competitive) algorithm for prophet secretary matching on general (respectively, bipartite) graphs under vertex arrivals.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0e4f5adf-e433-4676-b927-70041068d438Cited by top-tier papers3
- Improved Guarantees for Offline Stochastic Matching via new Ordered Contention Resolution SchemesBrian Brubach, Nathaniel Grammel, Will Ma, Aravind SrinivasanNeurIPS 2021 · 26 citations
- On (Random-order) Online Contention Resolution Schemes for the Matching Polytope of (Bipartite) GraphsCalum MacRury, Will Ma, Nathaniel GrammelSODA 2023 · 8 citations
- Optimal Rounding for Two-Stage Bipartite MatchingTristan Pollner, Amin Saberi, Anders WikumSODA 2026
Builds on2
- Improved Guarantees for Offline Stochastic Matching via new Ordered Contention Resolution SchemesBrian Brubach, Nathaniel Grammel, Will Ma, Aravind SrinivasanNeurIPS 2021 · 26 citations
- On (Random-order) Online Contention Resolution Schemes for the Matching Polytope of (Bipartite) GraphsCalum MacRury, Will Ma, Nathaniel GrammelSODA 2023 · 8 citations
Related papers
- Prophet Secretary and Matching: the Significance of the Largest ItemZiyun Chen, Zhiyi Huang, Dongchen Li, Zhihao Gavin TangSODA 2025 · 1 citation
- Online Weighted Matching with a SampleHaim Kaplan, David Naori, Danny RazSODA 2022 · 14 citations
- Simple and Optimal Greedy Online Contention Resolution SchemesVasilis LivanosNeurIPS 2022 · 1 citation
- Fully Dynamic Online Selection through Online Contention Resolution SchemesVashist Avadhanula, Andrea Celli, Riccardo Colini-Baldeschi, Stefano Leonardi et al.AAAI 2023 · 1 citation
- Multiway Online Correlated SelectionGuy Blanc, Moses CharikarFOCS 2021 · 16 citations
