Quantum Oblivious LWE Sampling and Insecurity of Standard Model Lattice-Based SNARKs
Thomas Debris-Alazard, Pouria Fallahpour, Damien Stehlé
Abstract
The Learning With Errors (LWE) problem asks to find s from an input of the form (A, b = As + e) ∈ (Z/qZ) m×n × (Z/qZ) m , for a vector e that has small-magnitude entries. In this work, we do not focus on solving LWE but on the task of sampling instances. As these are extremely sparse in their range, it may seem plausible that the only way to proceed is to first create s and e and then set b = As + e. In particular, such an instance sampler knows the solution. This raises the question whether it is possible to obliviously sample (A, As + e), namely, without knowing the underlying s. A variant of the assumption that oblivious LWE sampling is hard has been used in a series of works to analyze the security of candidate constructions of Succinct Non-interactive Arguments of Knowledge (SNARKs). As the assumption is related to LWE, these SNARKs have been conjectured to be secure in the presence of quantum adversaries.
Our main result is a quantum polynomial-time algorithm that samples well-distributed LWE instances while provably not knowing the solution, under the assumption that LWE is hard. Moreover, the approach works for a vast range of LWE parametrizations, including those used in the above-mentioned SNARKs. This invalidates the assumptions used in their security analyses, although it does not yield attacks against the constructions themselves. S m,n,q,χ : A ∈ (Z/qZ) m×n -→ b = As + e ∈ (Z/qZ) m .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d3565cf2-7527-466c-828b-82749a45657cCited by top-tier papers3
- LWE with Quantum Amplitudes: Algorithm, Hardness, and Oblivious SamplingYilei Chen, Zihan Hu, Qipeng Liu, Han Luo et al.CRYPTO 2025 · 3 citations
- Quantum Advantage from Soft DecodersAndré Chailloux, Jean-Pierre TillichSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
- On the Quantum Equivalence Between S| LWE > and ISISAndré Chailloux, Paul HermouetCRYPTO 2026
Builds on6
- Lattice-Based zk-SNARKs from Square Span ProgramsRosario Gennaro, Michele Minelli, Anca Nitulescu, Michele OrrùCCS 2018 · 62 citations
- Hardness of LWE on General Entropic DistributionsZvika Brakerski, Nico DöttlingEUROCRYPT 2020 · 36 citations
- Another Round of Breaking and Making Quantum Money: - How to Not Build It from Lattices, and MoreJiahui Liu, Hart Montgomery, Mark ZhandryEUROCRYPT 2023 · 21 citations
- Quantum Algorithms for Variants of Average-Case Lattice Problems via FilteringYilei Chen, Qipeng Liu, Mark ZhandryEUROCRYPT 2022 · 14 citations
- SLAP: Succinct Lattice-Based Polynomial Commitments from Standard AssumptionsMartin R. Albrecht, Giacomo Fenzi, Oleksandra Lapiha, Ngoc Khanh NguyenEUROCRYPT 2024 · 12 citations
Related papers
- SNARGs for from LWEArka Rai Choudhuri, Abhishek Jain, Zhengzhong JinFOCS 2021 · 62 citations
- A Systematic Study of Sparse LWEAayush Jain, Huijia Lin, Sagnik SahaCRYPTO 2024 · 8 citations
- SNARKs from LWE via Non-black-Box ReductionsZhengzhong Jin, Mingqi Lu, Bo PengSTOC 2026
- Unambiguous SNARGs for P from LWE with Applications to PPAD HardnessLiyan Chen, Cody Freitag, Zhengzhong Jin, Daniel WichsSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
- Candidate Obfuscation via Oblivious LWE SamplingHoeteck Wee, Daniel WichsEUROCRYPT 2021 · 78 citations
