SLAP: Succinct Lattice-Based Polynomial Commitments from Standard Assumptions
Martin R. Albrecht, Giacomo Fenzi, Oleksandra Lapiha, Ngoc Khanh Nguyen
Abstract
Recent works on lattice-based extractable polynomial commitments can be grouped into two classes: (i) non-interactive constructions that stem from the functional commitment by Albrecht, Cini, Lai, Malavolta and Thyagarajan (CRYPTO 2022), and (ii) lattice adaptations of the Bulletproofs protocol (S&P 2018). The former class enjoys security in the standard model, albeit a knowledge assumption is desired. In contrast, Bulletproof-like protocols can be made secure under falsifiable assumptions, but due to technical limitations regarding subtractive sets, they only offer inverse-polynomial soundness error. This issue becomes particularly problematic when transforming these protocols to the non-interactive setting using the Fiat-Shamir paradigm.
In this work, we propose the first lattice-based non-interactive extractable polynomial commitment scheme which achieves polylogarithmic proof size and verifier runtime (in the length of the committed message) under standard assumptions. At the core of our work lies a new tree-based commitment scheme, along with an efficient proof of polynomial evaluation inspired by FRI (ICALP 2018). Natively, the construction is secure under a "multi-instance version" of the Power-Ring BASIS assumption (Eprint 2023/846). We then base security on the Module-SIS assumption by introducing several re-randomisation techniques which can be of independent interest.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d16c2f66-bd12-4b17-9492-7a6a321fbb88Cited by top-tier papers3
- Blaze: Fast SNARKs from Interleaved RAA CodesMartijn Brehm, Binyi Chen, Ben Fisch, Nicolas Resch et al.EUROCRYPT 2025 · 15 citations
- Quantum Oblivious LWE Sampling and Insecurity of Standard Model Lattice-Based SNARKsThomas Debris-Alazard, Pouria Fallahpour, Damien StehléSTOC 2024 · 8 citations
- Solving the Tensor Isomorphism Problem for Special Orbits with Low Rank Points: Cryptanalysis and Repair of an Asiacrypt 2023 Commitment SchemeValerie Gilchrist, Laurane Marco, Christophe Petit, Gang TangCRYPTO 2024 · 4 citations
Builds on27
- Bulletproofs: Short Proofs for Confidential Transactions and MoreBenedikt Bünz, Jonathan Bootle, Dan Boneh, Andrew Poelstra et al.S&P 2018 · 1,285 citations
- Doubly-Efficient zkSNARKs Without Trusted SetupRiad S. Wahby, Ioanna Tzialla, Abhi Shelat, Justin Thaler et al.S&P 2018 · 356 citations
- Marlin: Preprocessing zkSNARKs with Universal and Updatable SRSAlessandro Chiesa, Yuncong Hu, Mary Maller, Pratyush Mishra et al.EUROCRYPT 2020 · 356 citations
- Ligero: Lightweight Sublinear Arguments Without a Trusted SetupScott Ames, Carmit Hazay, Yuval Ishai, Muthuramakrishnan VenkitasubramaniamCCS 2017 · 338 citations
- Transparent SNARKs from DARK CompilersBenedikt Bünz, Ben Fisch, Alan SzepieniecEUROCRYPT 2020 · 240 citations
Related papers
- Polynomial Commitments from Lattices: Post-quantum Security, Fast Verification and Transparent SetupValerio Cini, Giulio Malavolta, Ngoc Khanh Nguyen, Hoeteck WeeCRYPTO 2024 · 10 citations
- Concretely Efficient Lattice-Based Polynomial Commitment from Standard AssumptionsIntak Hwang, Jinyeong Seo, Yongsoo SongCRYPTO 2024 · 9 citations
- Greyhound: Fast Polynomial Commitments from LatticesNgoc Khanh Nguyen, Gregor SeilerCRYPTO 2024 · 15 citations
- Succinct Vector, Polynomial, and Functional Commitments from LatticesHoeteck Wee, David J. WuEUROCRYPT 2023 · 54 citations
- DewTwo: A Transparent PCS with Quasi-Linear Prover, Logarithmic Verifier and 4.5KB Proofs from Falsifiable AssumptionsBenedikt Bünz, Tushar Mopuri, Alireza Shirzad, Sriram SridharCRYPTO 2025 · 1 citation
