Label Delay in Online Continual Learning
Botos Csaba, Wenxuan Zhang, Matthias Müller, Ser Nam Lim, Philip Torr, Adel Bibi
Abstract
Online continual learning, the process of training models on streaming data, has gained increasing attention in recent years. However, a critical aspect often overlooked is the label delay, where new data may not be labeled due to slow and costly annotation processes. We introduce a new continual learning framework with explicit modeling of the label delay between data and label streams over time steps. In each step, the framework reveals both unlabeled data from the current time step and labels delayed with steps, from the time step . In our extensive experiments amounting to 1060 GPU days, we show that merely augmenting the computational resources is insufficient to tackle this challenge. Our findings underline a notable performance decline when solely relying on labeled data when the label delay becomes significant. More surprisingly, when using state-of-the-art SSL and TTA techniques to utilize the newer, unlabeled data, they fail to surpass the performance of a naïve method that simply trains on the delayed supervised stream. To this end, we introduce a simple, efficient baseline that rehearses from the labeled memory samples that are most similar to the new unlabeled samples. This method bridges the accuracy gap caused by label delay without significantly increasing computational complexity. We show experimentally that our method is the least affected by the label delay factor and in some cases successfully recovers the accuracy of the non-delayed counterpart. We conduct various ablations and sensitivity experiments, demonstrating the effectiveness of our approach.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- CRoP: Context-wise Robust Static Human-Sensing PersonalizationSawinder Kaur, Avery Gump, Yi Xiao, Jingyu Xin et al.UbiComp 2025 · 2 citations
- Ranked Entropy Minimization for Continual Test-Time AdaptationJisu Han, Jaemin Na, Wonjun HwangICML 2025
Builds on29
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Bootstrap Your Own Latent - A New Approach to Self-Supervised LearningJean-Bastien Grill, Florian Strub, Florent Altché, Corentin Tallec et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 9,171 citations
- Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy ReductionJure Zbontar, Li Jing, Ishan Misra, Yann LeCun et al.ICML 2021 · 2,942 citations
- An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision TransformersXinlei Chen, Saining Xie, Kaiming HeICCV 2021 · 2,340 citations
- Tent: Fully Test-Time Adaptation by Entropy MinimizationDequan Wang, Evan Shelhamer, Shaoteng Liu, Bruno A. Olshausen et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,731 citations
Related papers
- Label-Efficient Online Continual Object Detection in Streaming VideoJay Zhangjie Wu, David Junhao Zhang, Wynne Hsu, Mengmi Zhang et al.ICCV 2023 · 24 citations
- Continual Learning through Retrieval and ImaginationZhen Wang, Liu Liu, Yiqun Duan, Dacheng TaoAAAI 2022 · 45 citations
- Learn from Yesterday: A Semi-supervised Continual Learning Method for Supervision-Limited Text-to-SQL Task StreamsYongrui Chen, Xinnan Guo, Tongtong Wu, Guilin Qi et al.AAAI 2023 · 11 citations
- Rehearsal revealed: The limits and merits of revisiting samples in continual learningEli Verwimp, Matthias De Lange, Tinne TuytelaarsICCV 2021 · 121 citations
- Real-Time Evaluation in Online Continual Learning: A New HopeYasir Ghunaim, Adel Bibi, Kumail Alhamoud, Motasem Alfarra et al.CVPR 2023
