CRoP: Context-wise Robust Static Human-Sensing Personalization
Sawinder Kaur, Avery Gump, Yi Xiao, Jingyu Xin, Harshit Sharma, Nina R. Benway, Jonathan L. Preston, Asif Salekin
Abstract
The advancement in deep learning and internet-of-things have led to diverse human sensing applications. However, distinct patterns in human sensing, influenced by various factors or contexts, challenge the generic neural network model's performance due to natural distribution shifts. To address this, personalization tailors models to individual users. Yet most personalization studies overlook intra-user heterogeneity across contexts in sensory data, limiting intra-user generalizability. This limitation is especially critical in clinical applications, where limited data availability hampers both generalizability and personalization. Notably, intra-user sensing attributes are expected to change due to external factors such as treatment progression, further complicating the challenges. To address the intra-user generalization challenge, this work introduces CRoP, a novel static personalization approach. CRoP leverages off-the-shelf pre-trained models as generic starting points and captures user-specific traits through adaptive pruning on a minimal sub-network while allowing generic knowledge to be incorporated in remaining parameters. CRoP demonstrates superior personalization effectiveness and intra-user robustness across four human-sensing datasets, including two from real-world health domains, underscoring its practical and social impact. Additionally, to support CRoP's generalization ability and design choices, we provide empirical justification through gradient inner product analysis, ablation studies, and comparisons against state-of-the-art baselines.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Ubiquitous and mobile computing theory, concepts and paradigms.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on18
- Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain AdaptationJian Liang, Dapeng Hu, Jiashi FengICML 2020 · 1,624 citations
- TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging ModelsPrateek Yadav, Derek Tam, Leshem Choshen, Colin A. Raffel et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 999 citations
- Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image ClassificationRohan Taori, Achal Dave, Vaishaal Shankar, Nicholas Carlini et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 731 citations
- Continual Test-Time Domain AdaptationQin Wang, Olga Fink, Luc Van Gool, Dengxin DaiCVPR 2022 · 383 citations
- Gradient Matching for Domain GeneralizationYuge Shi, Jeffrey Seely, Philip H. S. Torr, Siddharth Narayanaswamy et al.ICLR 2022 · 358 citations
Related papers
- Person-Centered Predictions of Psychological Constructs with Social Media Contextualized by Multimodal SensingKoustuv Saha, Ted Grover, Stephen M. Mattingly, Vedant Das Swain et al.UbiComp 2021 · 45 citations
- Evaluating Cross-Study Generalization of Receptivity Models for Just-in-Time Adaptive InterventionsSamarth Negi, Roman Keller, Jacqueline L. Mair, Birgit Kleim et al.UbiComp 2026
- CrossShift: Quantifying Interpersonal Differences in Mobile Sensing for Mental HealthPanyu Zhang, Minseo Park, Tomiris Ismatzoda, Azizbek Mustafakulov et al.UbiComp 2026
- Towards a Universal 3D Medical Multi-Modality Generalization via Learning Personalized Invariant RepresentationZhaorui Tan, Xi Yang, Tan Pan, Tianyi Liu et al.ICCV 2025 · 5 citations
- DISCO: Dynamic and Invariant Sensitive Channel Obfuscation for Deep Neural NetworksAbhishek Singh, Ayush Chopra, Ethan Garza, Emily Zhang et al.CVPR 2021
