An Epistemic Position-Based Click Model: From Interactions to Epistemic Distributions of Relevance and Bias
Oscar Rolando Ramirez Milian, Harrie Oosterhuis
Abstract
User interactions with rankings are affected by both items' relevances and display positions. Accordingly, click probabilities are often modeled as a product of relevance and position factors; and for improving recommendation and search, one needs to disentangle relevance from position bias. However, existing click models only provide frequentist point-estimates that do not capture any measure of epistemic uncertainty. Consequently, there is no indication of how much confidence one should have in their predictions. In this work, we introduce the first evidential deep-learning approach to form an epistemic alternative to the important position-based click model. Our learned model takes as input item and position features and outputs a beta-distribution for every relevance and position-bias variable of the position-based model. These distributions capture epistemic uncertainty about click probabilities and the underlying effects of attraction and position bias. The main challenge of our approach is its optimization for which we propose approximation and conditioning techniques to provide numerical stability and variance reduction. Our experiments indicate that our approach captures epistemic uncertainty in predictions on previously-unseen data, whereas standard policy gradients fail to learn meaningful distributions. We believe our contribution of the first contextual epistemic click model constitutes an important step in incorporating Bayesian uncertainty into click modeling.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d2cee133-5661-42d4-a284-5b2c8b0aeb1eBuilds on9
- Deep Evidential RegressionAlexander Amini, Wilko Schwarting, Ava Soleimany, Daniela RusNeurIPS 2020 · 777 citations
- Correcting for Selection Bias in Learning-to-rank SystemsZohreh Ovaisi, Ragib Ahsan, Yifan Zhang, Kathryn Vasilaky et al.WWW 2020 · 123 citations
- Pitfalls of Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification through Loss MinimisationViktor Bengs, Eyke Hüllermeier, Willem WaegemanNeurIPS 2022 · 78 citations
- Computationally Efficient Optimization of Plackett-Luce Ranking Models for Relevance and FairnessHarrie OosterhuisSIGIR 2021 · 68 citations
- The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Evidential RegressionNis Meinert, Jakob Gawlikowski, Alexander LavinAAAI 2023 · 58 citations
Related papers
- Is Epistemic Uncertainty Faithfully Represented by Evidential Deep Learning Methods?Mira Jürgens, Nis Meinert, Viktor Bengs, Eyke Hüllermeier et al.ICML 2024 · 35 citations
- A Deep Recurrent Survival Model for Unbiased RankingJiarui Jin, Yuchen Fang, Weinan Zhang, Kan Ren et al.SIGIR 2020 · 16 citations
- Mitigating Exploitation Bias in Learning to Rank with an Uncertainty-aware Empirical Bayes ApproachTao Yang, Cuize Han, Chen Luo, Parth Gupta et al.WWW 2024 · 10 citations
- On the Impact of Outlier Bias on User ClicksFatemeh Sarvi, Ali Vardasbi, Mohammad Aliannejadi, Sebastian Schelter et al.SIGIR 2023 · 6 citations
- BayesCNS: A Unified Bayesian Approach to Address Cold Start and Non-Stationarity in Search Systems at ScaleRandy Ardywibowo, Rakesh Sunki, Shin Tsz Lucy Kuo, Sankalp NayakAAAI 2025
