Serberus: Protecting Cryptographic Code from Spectres at Compile-Time
Nicholas Mosier, Hamed Nemati, John C. Mitchell, Caroline Trippel
Abstract
We present Serberus, the first comprehensive mitigation for hardening constant-time (CT) code against Spectre attacks (involving the PHT, BTB, RSB, STL, and/or PSF speculation primitives) on existing hardware. Serberus is based on three insights. First, some hardware control-flow integrity (CFI) protections restrict transient control-flow to the extent that it may be comprehensively considered by software analyses. Second, conformance to the accepted CT code discipline permits two code patterns that are unsafe in the post-Spectre era. Third, once these code patterns are addressed, all Spectre leakage of secrets in CT programs can be attributed to one of four classes of taint primitives—instructions that can transiently assign a secret value to a publicly-typed register. We evaluate Serberus on cryptographic primitives in the OpenSSL, Libsodium, and Hacl* libraries. Serberus introduces 21.3% runtime overhead on average, compared to 24.9% for the next closest state-of-the-art software mitigation, which is less secure.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d1cb86fc-79ad-4a03-b0f0-0dc01799743dCited by top-tier papers11
- RTL Verification for Secure Speculation Using Contract Shadow LogicQinhan Tan, Yuheng Yang, Thomas Bourgeat, Sharad Malik et al.ASPLOS 2025 · 12 citations
- RTL2MμPATH: Multi-μPATH Synthesis with Applications to Hardware Security VerificationYao Hsiao, Nikos Nikoleris, Artem Khyzha, Dominic P. Mulligan et al.MICRO 2024 · 12 citations
- Automated Side-Channel Analysis of Cryptographic Protocol ImplementationsFaezeh Nasrabadi, Robert Künnemann, Hamed NematiCCS 2026 · 2 citations
- Cassandra: Efficient Enforcement of Sequential Execution for Cryptographic ProgramsAli Hajiabadi, Trevor E. CarlsonISCA 2025 · 2 citations
- Specification and Verification of Strong Timing Isolation of Hardware EnclavesStella Lau, Thomas Bourgeat, Clément Pit-Claudel, Adam ChlipalaCCS 2024 · 1 citation
Builds on54
- Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative ExecutionPaul Kocher, Jann Horn, Anders Fogh, Daniel Genkin et al.S&P 2019 · 2,435 citations
- Foreshadow: Extracting the Keys to the Intel SGX Kingdom with Transient Out-of-Order ExecutionJo Van Bulck, Marina Minkin, Ofir Weisse, Daniel Genkin et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 1,175 citations
- DRAMA: Exploiting DRAM Addressing for Cross-CPU AttacksPeter Pessl, Daniel Gruss, Clémentine Maurice, Michael Schwarz et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 500 citations
- ZombieLoad: Cross-Privilege-Boundary Data SamplingMichael Schwarz, Moritz Lipp, Daniel Moghimi, Jo Van Bulck et al.CCS 2019 · 464 citations
- A Systematic Evaluation of Transient Execution Attacks and DefensesClaudio Canella, Jo Van Bulck, Michael Schwarz, Moritz Lipp et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 442 citations
Related papers
- SpecCFI: Mitigating Spectre Attacks using CFI Informed SpeculationEsmaeil Mohammadian Koruyeh, Shirin Haji Amin Shirazi, Khaled N. Khasawneh, Chengyu Song et al.S&P 2020 · 74 citations
- Protecting Cryptographic Code Against Spectre-RSB: (and, in Fact, All Known Spectre Variants)Santiago Arranz-Olmos, Gilles Barthe, Chitchanok Chuengsatiansup, Benjamin Grégoire et al.ASPLOS 2025 · 1 citation
- Declassiflow: A Static Analysis for Modeling Non-Speculative Knowledge to Relax Speculative Execution Security MeasuresRutvik Choudhary, Alan Wang, Zirui Neil Zhao, Adam Morrison et al.CCS 2023 · 4 citations
- ProSpeCT: Provably Secure Speculation for the Constant-Time PolicyLesly-Ann Daniel, Marton Bognar, Job Noorman, Sébastien Bardin et al.USENIX Security 2023
- Place Protections at the Right Place: Targeted Hardening for Cryptographic Code against Spectre v1Yiming Zhu, Wenchao Huang, Yan XiongUSENIX Security 2025
