USENIX Security2023Top-tier venue
ProSpeCT: Provably Secure Speculation for the Constant-Time Policy
Lesly-Ann Daniel, Marton Bognar, Job Noorman, Sébastien Bardin, Tamara Rezk, Frank Piessens
Abstract
We propose ProSpeCT, a generic formal processor model providing provably secure speculation for the constant-time policy. For constant-time programs under a non-speculative semantics, ProSpeCT guarantees that speculative and out-of-order execution cause no microarchitectural leaks. This guarantee is achieved by tracking secrets in the processor pipeline and ensuring that they do not influence the microarchitectural state during speculative execution. Our formalization covers a broad class of speculation mechanisms, generalizing prior work. As a result, our security proof covers all known Spectre attacks, including load value injection (LVI) attacks. In addition to the formal model, we provide a prototype hardware implementation of ProSpeCT on a RISC-V processor and show evidence of its low impact on hardware cost, performance, and required software changes. In particular, the experimental evaluation confirms our expectation that for a compliant constant-time binary, enabling ProSpeCT incurs no performance overhead.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 6df5a3c3-53ee-44ac-b572-c800e9ee605bCited by top-tier papers16
- SpecLFB: Eliminating Cache Side Channels in Speculative ExecutionsXiaoyu Cheng, Fei Tong, Hongyu Wang, Zhe Zhou et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 7 citations
- Architectural Mimicry: Innovative Instructions to Efficiently Address Control-Flow Leakage in Data-Oblivious ProgramsHans Winderix, Marton Bognar, Job Noorman, Lesly-Ann Daniel et al.S&P 2024 · 5 citations
- Towards Efficient Verification of Constant-Time Cryptographic ImplementationsLuwei Cai, Fu Song, Taolue ChenFSE 2024 · 4 citations
- On Kernel's Safety in the Spectre Era (And KASLR is Formally Dead)Davide Davoli, Martin Avanzini, Tamara RezkCCS 2024 · 2 citations
- Cassandra: Efficient Enforcement of Sequential Execution for Cryptographic ProgramsAli Hajiabadi, Trevor E. CarlsonISCA 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on38
- Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative ExecutionPaul Kocher, Jann Horn, Anders Fogh, Daniel Genkin et al.S&P 2019 · 2,435 citations
- Meltdown: Reading Kernel Memory from User SpaceMoritz Lipp, Michael Schwarz, Daniel Gruss, Thomas Prescher et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 1,456 citations
- Foreshadow: Extracting the Keys to the Intel SGX Kingdom with Transient Out-of-Order ExecutionJo Van Bulck, Marina Minkin, Ofir Weisse, Daniel Genkin et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 1,175 citations
- ret2spec: Speculative Execution Using Return Stack BuffersGiorgi Maisuradze, Christian RossowCCS 2018 · 282 citations
- LVI: Hijacking Transient Execution through Microarchitectural Load Value InjectionJo Van Bulck, Daniel Moghimi, Michael Schwarz, Moritz Lipp et al.S&P 2020 · 275 citations
Related papers
- InSpectre: Breaking and Fixing Microarchitectural Vulnerabilities by Formal AnalysisRoberto Guanciale, Musard Balliu, Mads DamCCS 2020 · 51 citations
- Constant-time foundations for the new spectre eraSunjay Cauligi, Craig Disselkoen, Klaus von Gleissenthall, Dean M. Tullsen et al.PLDI 2020 · 90 citations
- Levioso: Efficient Compiler-Informed Secure SpeculationAli Hajiabadi, Archit Agarwal, Andreas Diavastos, Trevor E. CarlsonDAC 2024 · 1 citation
- Speculative interference attacks: breaking invisible speculation schemesMohammad Behnia, Prateek Sahu, Riccardo Paccagnella, Jiyong Yu et al.ASPLOS 2021 · 69 citations
- Spectre on RISC-V Silicon: Attacks and Defenses on Commercial Out-of-Order ProcessorsLukas Gerlach, Marton Bognar, Daniel Weber, Michael Schwarz et al.USENIX Security 2026
