Progressively Label Enhancement for Large Language Model Alignment
Biao Liu, Ning Xu, Xin Geng
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLM) alignment aims to prevent models from producing content that misaligns with human expectations, which can lead to ethical and legal concerns. In the last few years, Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has been the most prominent method for achieving alignment. Due to challenges in stability and scalability with RLHF stages, which arise from the complex interactions between multiple models, researchers are exploring alternative methods to achieve effects comparable to those of RLHF. However, these methods often rely on large high-quality datasets. Despite some methods considering the generation of additional data to expand datasets, they often treat model training and data generation as separate and static processes, overlooking the fact that these processes are highly interdependent, leading to inefficient utilization of the generated data. To deal with this problem, we propose PLE, i.e., Progressively Label Enhancement for LLM Alignment, a framework that dynamically adjusts the model's training process based on the evolving quality of the generated data. Specifically, we prompt the model to generate responses for both the original query and the query guided by a set of carefully designed principles, and then utilize a dynamic threshold to determine the appropriate training approach for both responses based on their corresponding reward scores. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of PLE compared to existing LLM alignment methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d17064ad-b409-4578-959b-7f5caeb68f1cCited by top-tier papers3
- Alignment through Meta-Weighted Online Sampling: Bridging the Gap between Data Generation and Preference OptimizationJunming Yang, Ning Xu, Biao Liu, Shiqi Qiao et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Can Class-Priors Help Single-Positive Multi-Label Learning?Biao Liu, Ning Xu, Jie Wang, Xin GengNeurIPS 2025
- UNITE: Universal kNowledge Integration from Task-specific ExpertsShuxia Lin, Qiufeng Wang 00002, Xu Yang, Xin GengICLR 2026
Builds on15
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- LIMA: Less Is More for AlignmentChunting Zhou, Pengfei Liu, Puxin Xu, Srinivasan Iyer et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,486 citations
- Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated InstructionsYizhong Wang, Yeganeh Kordi, Swaroop Mishra, Alisa Liu et al.ACL 2023 · 540 citations
Related papers
- Influence-based Online Experience Selection for Effective RLHFYifan Gong, Jing Yao, Xiting Wang, Xunlong Wang et al.ACL 2026
- DeAL: Decoding-time Alignment for Large Language ModelsJames Y. Huang, Sailik Sengupta, Daniele Bonadiman, Yi-An Lai et al.ACL 2025
- Alignment Tampering: How Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback Is Exploited to Optimize Misaligned BiasesDongyoon Hahm, Dylan Hadfield-Menell, Kimin LeeICML 2026
- On a Connection Between Imitation Learning and RLHFTeng Xiao, Yige Yuan, Mingxiao Li, Zhengyu Chen et al.ICLR 2025
- Generative RLHF-V: Learning Principles from Multi-modal Human PreferenceJiayi Zhou, Jiaming Ji, Boyuan Chen, Jiapeng Sun et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
