What If Consensus Lies? Selective-Complementary Reinforcement Learning at Test Time
Dong Yan, Jian Liang, Yanbo Wang, Shuo Lu, Ran He, Tieniu Tan
Abstract
Test-Time Reinforcement Learning (TTRL) enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance reasoning capabilities on unlabeled test streams by deriving pseudo-rewards from majority voting consensus. However, existing TTRL methods rely exclusively on positive pseudo-labeling strategies. Such reliance becomes vulnerable under challenging scenarios where answer distributions are highly dispersed, resulting in weak consensus that inadvertently reinforces incorrect trajectories as supervision signals. In this paper, we propose SCRL (Selective-Complementary Reinforcement Learning), a robust test-time reinforcement learning framework that effectively mitigates label noise amplification. SCRL develops Selective Positive Pseudo-Labeling, which enforces strict consensus criteria to filter unreliable majorities. Complementarily, SCRL introduces Entropy-Gated Negative Pseudo-Labeling, the first negative supervision mechanism in TTRL, to reliably prune incorrect trajectories based on generation uncertainty. Extensive experiments on multiple reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that SCRL achieves substantial improvements over baselines, while maintaining robust generalization and training stability under constrained rollout budgets. Our code is available at https://github.com/Jasper-Yan/SCRL .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d0e33c31-14a0-45c8-a8f4-8d5a19da86ccCited by top-tier papers2
- Mitigating the Safety–Utility Trade-off in LLM Alignment via Adaptive Safe Context LearningYanbo Wang, Minzheng Wang, Jian Liang, Lu Wang et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- USE: A Unified Self-Ensembling Framework for Test-Time Prompt TuningSiru Jiang, Jian Liang, Ran He, Tieniu TanICML 2026
Builds on13
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free RewardYu Meng, Mengzhou Xia, Danqi ChenNeurIPS 2024 · 1,203 citations
- Absolute Zero: Reinforced Self-play Reasoning with Zero DataAndrew Zhao, Yiran Wu, Tong Wu, Quentin Xu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 361 citations
- Learning to Reason without External RewardsXuandong Zhao, Zhewei Kang, Aosong Feng, Sergey Levine et al.ICLR 2026 · 218 citations
Related papers
- Beyond Majority Voting: Self-Reflective Test-Time Reinforcement Learning for LLM ReasoningSitong Wu, Haoru Tan, Xichen Zhang, Bin Xia et al.ICML 2026
- TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement LearningYuxin Zuo, Kaiyan Zhang, Li Sheng, Shang Qu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 249 citations
- ECHO: Entropy-Confidence Hybrid Optimization for Test-Time Reinforcement LearningChu Zhao, Enneng Yang, Yuting Liu, Jianzhe Zhao et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Beyond Majority Voting: Towards Fine-grained and More Reliable Reward Signal for Test-Time Reinforcement LearningWeiqin Wang, Yile Wang, Kehao Chen, Hui HuangACL 2026 · 5 citations
- CoVerRL: Breaking the Consensus Trap in Label-Free Reasoning via Generator-Verifier Co-EvolutionTeng Pan, Yuchen Yan, Zixuan Wang, Ruiqing Zhang et al.ACL 2026 · 5 citations
