Learning to Reason without External Rewards
Xuandong Zhao, Zhewei Kang, Aosong Feng, Sergey Levine, Dawn Song
Abstract
Training large language models (LLMs) for complex reasoning via Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is effective but limited by reliance on costly, domain-specific supervision. We explore Reinforcement Learning from Internal Feedback (RLIF), a framework that enables LLMs to learn from intrinsic signals without external rewards or labeled data. We propose INTUITOR, an RLIF method that uses a model's own confidence-termed selfcertainty-as its sole reward signal. INTUITOR replaces external rewards in Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) with self-certainty scores, enabling fully unsupervised learning. Experiments demonstrate that INTUITOR matches GRPO's performance on mathematical benchmarks while achieving better generalization to out-of-domain tasks like code generation, without requiring gold solutions or test cases. Our findings show that intrinsic model signals can drive effective learning across domains, offering a scalable alternative to RLVR for autonomous AI systems where verifiable rewards are unavailable. Code is available at https://github.com/sunblaze-ucb/Intuitor .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2b034266-58c9-4757-8358-190861601efdCited by top-tier papers71
- Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable DomainsAnisha Gunjal, Anthony Wang, Elaine Lau, Vaskar Nath et al.ICLR 2026 · 340 citations
- R-Zero: Self-Evolving Reasoning LLM from Zero DataChengsong Huang, Wenhao Yu, Xiaoyang Wang, Hongming Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 220 citations
- Right Question is Already Half the Answer: Fully Unsupervised LLM Reasoning IncentivizationQingyang Zhang, Haitao Wu, Changqing Zhang, Peilin Zhao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 134 citations
- Geometric-Mean Policy OptimizationYuzhong Zhao, Yue Liu, Junpeng Liu, Jingye Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 104 citations
- Reasoning with Sampling: Your Base Model is Smarter Than You ThinkAayush Karan, Yilun DuICLR 2026 · 87 citations
Builds on22
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code GenerationJiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 2,317 citations
- STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With ReasoningEric Zelikman, Yuhuai Wu, Jesse Mu, Noah D. GoodmanNeurIPS 2022 · 1,126 citations
Related papers
- Empowering Multi-Turn Tool-Integrated Agentic Reasoning with Group Turn Policy OptimizationYifeng Ding, Hung Le, Songyang Han, Kangrui Ruan et al.ACL 2026 · 5 citations
- Decoupling Reasoning and Confidence: Resurrecting Calibration in Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable RewardsZhengzhao Ma, Xueru Wen, Boxi Cao, Yaojie Lu et al.ICML 2026 · 5 citations
- How Far Can Unsupervised RLVR Scale LLM Training?Bingxiang He, Yuxin Zuo, Zeyuan Liu, Shangziqi Zhao et al.ICLR 2026 · 31 citations
- Noise-corrected GRPO: From Noisy Rewards to Unbiased GradientsOmar Elmansouri, Fathinah Izzati, Mohamed El Amine Seddik, Salem LahlouICML 2026 · 8 citations
- Breaking the Self-Confirming Loop: Diagnosing and Mitigating Systemic Reward Bias in Self-Rewarding RLChuyi Tan, Peiwen Yuan, Xinglin Wang, Yiwei Li et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
