Boundary thickness and robustness in learning models
Yaoqing Yang, Rajiv Khanna, Yaodong Yu, Amir Gholami, Kurt Keutzer, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Kannan Ramchandran, Michael W. Mahoney
Abstract
Robustness of machine learning models to various adversarial and non-adversarial corruptions continues to be of interest. In this paper, we introduce the notion of the boundary thickness of a classifier, and we describe its connection with and usefulness for model robustness. Thick decision boundaries lead to improved performance, while thin decision boundaries lead to overfitting (e.g., measured by the robust generalization gap between training and testing) and lower robustness. We show that a thicker boundary helps improve robustness against adversarial examples (e.g., improving the robust test accuracy of adversarial training) as well as so-called out-of-distribution (OOD) transforms, and we show that many commonly-used regularization and data augmentation procedures can increase boundary thickness. On the theoretical side, we establish that maximizing boundary thickness during training is akin to the so-called mixup training. Using these observations, we show that noise-augmentation on mixup training further increases boundary thickness, thereby combating vulnerability to various forms of adversarial attacks and OOD transforms. We can also show that the performance improvement in several lines of recent work happens in conjunction with a thicker boundary.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d0a0ab06-b26d-4f54-979e-5fedbc0f4e32Cited by top-tier papers14
- Model Orthogonalization: Class Distance Hardening in Neural Networks for Better SecurityGuanhong Tao, Yingqi Liu, Guangyu Shen, Qiuling Xu et al.S&P 2022 · 57 citations
- Removing Batch Normalization Boosts Adversarial TrainingHaotao Wang, Aston Zhang, Shuai Zheng, Xingjian Shi et al.ICML 2022 · 51 citations
- Noisy Feature MixupSoon Hoe Lim, N. Benjamin Erichson, Francisco Utrera, Winnie Xu et al.ICLR 2022 · 43 citations
- Graph Mixup with Soft AlignmentsHongyi Ling, Zhimeng Jiang, Meng Liu, Shuiwang Ji et al.ICML 2023 · 28 citations
- Fantastic Robustness Measures: The Secrets of Robust GeneralizationHoki Kim, Jinseong Park, Yujin Choi, Jaewook LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 13 citations
Builds on6
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations Against Deep Neural NetworksNicolas Papernot, Patrick D. McDaniel, Xi Wu, Somesh Jha et al.S&P 2016 · 3,275 citations
- AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and UncertaintyDan Hendrycks, Norman Mu, Ekin Dogus Cubuk, Barret Zoph et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,572 citations
- Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningLeslie Rice, Eric Wong, J. Zico KolterICML 2020 · 935 citations
- Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning StrongerJingfeng Zhang, Xilie Xu, Bo Han, Gang Niu et al.ICML 2020 · 452 citations
Related papers
- How Does Mixup Help With Robustness and Generalization?Linjun Zhang, Zhun Deng, Kenji Kawaguchi, Amirata Ghorbani et al.ICLR 2021 · 294 citations
- MaxUp: Lightweight Adversarial Training With Data Augmentation Improves Neural Network TrainingChengyue Gong, Tongzheng Ren, Mao Ye, Qiang LiuCVPR 2021
- Reducing Excessive Margin to Achieve a Better Accuracy vs. Robustness Trade-offRahul Rade, Seyed-Mohsen Moosavi-DezfooliICLR 2022 · 166 citations
- Adversarial Unlearning: Reducing Confidence Along Adversarial DirectionsAmrith Setlur, Benjamin Eysenbach, Virginia Smith, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2022 · 26 citations
- RC-Mixup: A Data Augmentation Strategy against Noisy Data for Regression TasksSeonghyeon Hwang, Minsu Kim, Steven Euijong WhangKDD 2024 · 4 citations
