SentinelNet: Safeguarding Multi-Agent Collaboration Through Credit-Based Dynamic Threat Detection
Yang Feng, Xudong Pan
Abstract
Malicious agents pose significant threats to the reliability and decision-making capabilities of Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) powered by Large Language Models (LLMs). Existing defenses often fall short due to reactive designs or centralized architectures which may introduce single points of failure. To address these challenges, we propose SentinelNet, the first decentralized framework for proactively detecting and mitigating malicious behaviors in multi-agent collaboration. SentinelNet equips each agent with a credit-based detector trained via contrastive learning on augmented adversarial debate trajectories, enabling autonomous evaluation of message credibility and dynamic neighbor ranking via bottom-k elimination to suppress malicious communications. To overcome the scarcity of attack data, it generates adversarial trajectories simulating diverse threats, ensuring robust training. Experiments on MAS benchmarks show SentinelNet achieves near-perfect detection of malicious agents, close to 100% within two debate rounds, and recovers 95% of system accuracy from compromised baselines. By exhibiting strong generalizability across domains and attack patterns, SentinelNet establishes a novel paradigm for safeguarding collaborative MAS. CCS Concepts • Computing methodologies → Artificial intelligence; Multiagent systems; • Security and privacy → Systems security.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d044b361-fb8d-4d8a-9ad0-3b9453f27a93Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on9
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model SocietyGuohao Li, Hasan Hammoud, Hani Itani, Dmitrii Khizbullin et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,975 citations
- Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent DebateYilun Du, Shuang Li, Antonio Torralba, Joshua B. Tenenbaum et al.ICML 2024 · 1,562 citations
Related papers
- Securing Multi-Agent Systems Against Corruptions via Node Contribution BackpropagationChengcan Wu, Zhixin Zhang, Mingqian Xu, Zeming Wei et al.ICML 2026
- AgentSentinel: An End-to-End and Real-Time Security Defense Framework for Computer-Use AgentsHaitao Hu, Peng Chen, Yanpeng Zhao, Yuqi ChenCCS 2025
- OpenDeception: Learning Deception and Trust in Human–AI Interaction via Multi-Agent SimulationYichen Wu, Qianqian Gao, Xudong Pan, Geng Hong et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Explainable and Fine-Grained Safeguarding of LLM Multi-Agent Systems via Bi-Level Graph Anomaly DetectionJunjun Pan, Yixin Liu, Rui Miao, Kaize Ding et al.ACL 2026 · 6 citations
- When Agents Go Rogue: Activation-Based Detection of Malicious Behaviors in Multi-Agent SystemsHaowen Xu, Xue Tan, Lei Ma, Zhihao Zhang et al.ICML 2026
