Learning Exposure Mapping Functions for Inferring Heterogeneous Peer Effects
Shishir Adhikari, Sourav Medya, Elena Zheleva
Abstract
In causal inference, interference refers to the phenomenon in which the actions of peers in a network can influence an individual's outcome. Peer effect refers to the difference in counterfactual outcomes of an individual for different levels of peer exposure, the extent to which an individual is exposed to the treatments, actions, or behaviors of peers. Estimating peer effects requires deciding how to represent peer exposure. Typically, researchers define an exposure mapping function that aggregates peer treatments and outputs peer exposure. Most existing approaches for defining exposure mapping functions assume peer exposure based on the number or fraction of treated peers. Recent studies have investigated more complex functions of peer exposure which capture that different peers can exert different degrees of influence. However, none of these works have explicitly considered the problem of automatically learning the exposure mapping function. In this work, we focus on learning this function for the purpose of estimating heterogeneous peer effects, where heterogeneity refers to the variation in counterfactual outcomes for the same peer exposure but different individual's contexts. We develop EgoNetGNN, a graph neural network (GNN)-based method, to automatically learn the appropriate exposure mapping function allowing for complex peer influence mechanisms that, in addition to peer treatments, can involve the local neighborhood structure and edge attributes. We show that GNN models that use peer exposure based on the number or fraction of treated peers or learn peer exposure naively face difficulty accounting for such influence mechanisms. Our comprehensive evaluation on synthetic and semi-synthetic network data shows that our method is more robust to different unknown underlying influence mechanisms when estimating heterogeneous peer effects when compared to state-of-the-art baselines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d0356ffb-5667-4b04-bf22-8c8f40827040Builds on6
- Can Graph Neural Networks Count Substructures?Zhengdao Chen, Lei Chen, Soledad Villar, Joan BrunaNeurIPS 2020 · 392 citations
- Learning Causal Effects on HypergraphsJing Ma, Mengting Wan, Longqi Yang, Jundong Li et al.KDD 2022 · 61 citations
- Causal Network Motifs: Identifying Heterogeneous Spillover Effects in A/B TestsYuan Yuan, Kristen M. Altenburger, Farshad KootiWWW 2021 · 37 citations
- Doubly Robust Causal Effect Estimation under Networked Interference via Targeted LearningWeilin Chen, Ruichu Cai, Zeqin Yang, Jie Qiao et al.ICML 2024 · 17 citations
- Heterogeneous Peer Effects in the Linear Threshold ModelChristopher Tran, Elena ZhelevaAAAI 2022 · 15 citations
Related papers
- Telling Peer Direct Effects from Indirect Effects in Observational Network DataXiaojing Du, Jiuyong Li, Debo Cheng, Lin Liu et al.ICML 2025
- Using Embeddings for Causal Estimation of Peer Influence in Social NetworksIrina Cristali, Victor VeitchNeurIPS 2022 · 19 citations
- Causal Graph Transformer for Treatment Effect Estimation Under Unknown InterferenceAnpeng Wu, Haiyi Qiu, Zhengming Chen, Zijian Li et al.ICLR 2025
- Treatment Effect Estimation with Differentiated Networked Effect on Graph DataXiaofeng Lin, Han Bao, Hisashi KashimaKDD 2026
- Online Experimental Design With Estimation-Regret Trade-off Under Network InterferenceZhiheng Zhang, Zichen WangNeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
