Treatment Effect Estimation with Differentiated Networked Effect on Graph Data
Xiaofeng Lin, Han Bao, Hisashi Kashima
Abstract
Estimating individual treatment effect (ITE) from observational graph data is crucial for decision-making in the fields such as commerce and medicine. This task is challenging due to interference, where individual outcomes can be influenced by the treatments and covariates of their neighbors. Existing methods attempt to model such interference for accurate ITE estimation. However, a critical issue is often overlooked: differentiated networked effect (DNE), an effect caused by local networks consisting of neighbors with varying importance and scales. Capturing DNE is vital; otherwise, we will end up with imprecise ITE estimation due to an erroneous characterization of interference, which can result in misguided decisions. To address this challenge, we propose a novel interference modeling mechanism that incorporates two partial attention mechanisms and a message amplifier. The partial attention mechanisms automatically estimate the importance of different neighbors in contributing to interference, while the message amplifier adjusts the results of the interference modeling mechanism based on the scale of neighbors, all of which enables the model to capture DNE. Experiments on three real-world graphs demonstrate that our methods outperform existing approaches for ITE estimation from graph data, which corroborates the importance of explicitly capturing DNE.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5710e131-5620-423e-b9a4-77ab07b7b5beBuilds on25
- Do Transformers Really Perform Badly for Graph Representation?Chengxuan Ying, Tianle Cai, Shengjie Luo, Shuxin Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,632 citations
- Principal Neighbourhood Aggregation for Graph NetsGabriele Corso, Luca Cavalleri, Dominique Beaini, Pietro Liò et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 914 citations
- Graph Inductive Biases in Transformers without Message PassingLiheng Ma, Chen Lin, Derek Lim, Adriana Romero-Soriano et al.ICML 2023 · 185 citations
- Optimal Transport for Treatment Effect EstimationHao Wang, Jiajun Fan, Zhichao Chen, Haoxuan Li et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 71 citations
- Quantifying Ignorance in Individual-Level Causal-Effect Estimates under Hidden ConfoundingAndrew Jesson, Sören Mindermann, Yarin Gal, Uri ShalitICML 2021 · 66 citations
Related papers
- Telling Peer Direct Effects from Indirect Effects in Observational Network DataXiaojing Du, Jiuyong Li, Debo Cheng, Lin Liu et al.ICML 2025
- Learning Causal Effects on HypergraphsJing Ma, Mengting Wan, Longqi Yang, Jundong Li et al.KDD 2022 · 61 citations
- Learning Exposure Mapping Functions for Inferring Heterogeneous Peer EffectsShishir Adhikari, Sourav Medya, Elena ZhelevaICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Graph Infomax Adversarial Learning for Treatment Effect Estimation with Networked Observational DataZhixuan Chu, Stephen L. Rathbun, Sheng LiKDD 2021 · 24 citations
- Causal Graph Transformer for Treatment Effect Estimation Under Unknown InterferenceAnpeng Wu, Haiyi Qiu, Zhengming Chen, Zijian Li et al.ICLR 2025
