Sublinear-Time Lower Bounds for Approximating Matching Size using Non-Adaptive Queries
Vihan Shah
Abstract
We study the problem of estimating the size of the maximum matching in the sublinear-time setting. This problem has been extensively studied, with several known upper and lower bounds. A notable result by Behnezhad (FOCS 2021) established a 2-approximation in O(n) time.
However, all known upper and lower bounds are in the adaptive query model, where each query can depend on previous answers. In contrast, non-adaptive query models-where the distribution over all queries must be fixed in advance-are widely studied in property testing, often revealing fundamental gaps between adaptive and non-adaptive complexities. This raises the natural question: is adaptivity also necessary for approximating the maximum matching size in sublinear time? This motivates the goal of achieving a constant or even a polylogarithmic approximation using O(n) non-adaptive adjacency list queries, similar to what was done by Behnezhad using adaptive queries.
We show that this is not possible by proving that any randomized non-adaptive algorithm achieving an n 1/3-γ -approximation, for any constant γ > 0, with probability at least 2/3, must make Ω(n 1+ε ) adjacency list queries, for some constant ε > 0 depending on γ. This result highlights the necessity of adaptivity in achieving strong approximations. However, non-trivial upper bounds are still achievable: we present a simple randomized algorithm that achieves an n 1/2 -approximation in O(n log 2 n) queries.
Moreover, our lower bound also extends to the newly defined variant of the non-adaptive model, where queries are issued according to a fixed query tree, introduced by Azarmehr, Behnezhad, Ghafari, and Sudan (FOCS 2025) in the context of Local Computation Algorithms.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d002bad2-3643-4ac4-b340-aa2b9dd0635aBuilds on23
- Space Efficient Approximation to Maximum Matching Size from Uniform Edge SamplesMichael Kapralov, Slobodan Mitrovic, Ashkan Norouzi-Fard, Jakab TardosSODA 2020 · 30 citations
- A Deterministic Almost-Linear Time Algorithm for Minimum-Cost FlowJan van den Brand, Li Chen, Richard Peng, Rasmus Kyng et al.FOCS 2023 · 28 citations
- Local Distributed Rounding: Generalized to MIS, Matching, Set Cover, and BeyondSalwa Faour, Mohsen Ghaffari, Christoph Grunau, Fabian Kuhn et al.SODA 2023 · 22 citations
- Time-Optimal Sublinear Algorithms for Matching and Vertex CoverSoheil BehnezhadFOCS 2021 · 16 citations
- Dynamic Algorithms for Maximum Matching SizeSoheil BehnezhadSODA 2023 · 14 citations
Related papers
- Sublinear Time Algorithms and Complexity of Approximate Maximum MatchingSoheil Behnezhad, Mohammad Roghani, Aviad RubinsteinSTOC 2023 · 9 citations
- Sublinear Algorithms for (1.5+ε)-Approximate MatchingSayan Bhattacharya, Peter Kiss, Thatchaphol SaranurakSTOC 2023 · 8 citations
- Beating Greedy Matching in Sublinear TimeSoheil Behnezhad, Mohammad Roghani, Aviad Rubinstein, Amin SaberiSODA 2023 · 5 citations
- Dynamic Matching with Better-than-2 Approximation in Polylogarithmic Update TimeSayan Bhattacharya, Peter Kiss, Thatchaphol Saranurak, David WajcSODA 2023 · 11 citations
- Tight Pair Query Lower Bounds for Matching and Earth Mover's DistanceAmir Azarmehr, Soheil Behnezhad, Mohammad Roghani, Aviad RubinsteinFOCS 2025 · 2 citations
