Tight Pair Query Lower Bounds for Matching and Earth Mover's Distance
Amir Azarmehr, Soheil Behnezhad, Mohammad Roghani, Aviad Rubinstein
Abstract
How many adjacency matrix queries (also known as pair queries) are required to estimate the size of a maximum matching in an n-vertex graph G ? We study this fundamental question in this paper.On the upper bound side, an algorithm of Bhattacharya, Kiss, and Saranurak [FOCS’23] gives an estimate that is within of the right bound with queries, which is subquadratic in n (and thus sublinear in the matrix size) for any fixed . On the lower bound side, while there has been a lot of progress in the adjacency list model, no non-trivial lower bound has been established for algorithms with adjacency matrix query access. In particular, the only known lower bound is a folklore bound of , leaving a huge gap.In this paper, we present the first superlinear in n lower bound for this problem. In fact, we close the gap mentioned above entirely by showing that the algorithm of [BKS’23] is optimal. Formally, we prove that for any fixed , there is a fixed such that an estimate that is within of the true bound requires adjacency matrix queries.Our lower bound also has strong implications for estimating the earth mover’s distance between distributions. For this problem, Beretta and Rubinstein [STOC’24] gave an time algorithm that obtains an additive -approximation and works for any distance function. Whether this can be improved generally, or even for metric spaces, had remained open. Our lower bound rules out the possibility of any improvements over this bound, even under the strong assumption that the underlying distances are in a (1, 2)-metric.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1e19b979-e5a6-4b27-9ff4-fa815e46e302Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on16
- Space Efficient Approximation to Maximum Matching Size from Uniform Edge SamplesMichael Kapralov, Slobodan Mitrovic, Ashkan Norouzi-Fard, Jakab TardosSODA 2020 · 30 citations
- Time-Optimal Sublinear Algorithms for Matching and Vertex CoverSoheil BehnezhadFOCS 2021 · 16 citations
- Dynamic Algorithms for Maximum Matching SizeSoheil BehnezhadSODA 2023 · 14 citations
- Dynamic Matching with Better-than-2 Approximation in Polylogarithmic Update TimeSayan Bhattacharya, Peter Kiss, Thatchaphol Saranurak, David WajcSODA 2023 · 11 citations
- Dynamic (1+ϵ)-Approximate Matching Size in Truly Sublinear Update TimeSayan Bhattacharya, Peter Kiss, Thatchaphol SaranurakFOCS 2023 · 9 citations
Related papers
- Approximating Maximum Matching Requires Almost Quadratic TimeSoheil Behnezhad, Mohammad Roghani, Aviad RubinsteinSTOC 2024 · 2 citations
- Sublinear Time Algorithms and Complexity of Approximate Maximum MatchingSoheil Behnezhad, Mohammad Roghani, Aviad RubinsteinSTOC 2023 · 9 citations
- Sublinear-Time Lower Bounds for Approximating Matching Size using Non-Adaptive QueriesVihan ShahSODA 2026
- Local Computation Algorithms for Maximum Matching: New Lower BoundsSoheil Behnezhad, Mohammad Roghani, Aviad RubinsteinFOCS 2023 · 2 citations
- Beating Greedy Matching in Sublinear TimeSoheil Behnezhad, Mohammad Roghani, Aviad Rubinstein, Amin SaberiSODA 2023 · 5 citations
