Retrospector: Rapid collaborative reflection to improve collaborative practices
Soya Park, Chinmay Kulkarni
Abstract
Online platforms for freelancing allow teams performing complex work to be assembled in a matter of minutes and dispersed nearly as quickly. With such short time frames, ad hoc and virtual teams have few opportunities to learn strategies and effective team practices to work with their colleagues. Without such practices, teams are prone to work sub-optimally and lack direction. One key challenge in virtual teams discovering effective team practices is that because the practices ought to involve situated knowledge, it takes time to coalesce, as team members learn about each other over time. This work introduces Retrospector, that ad hoc teams can use to reflect collaboratively and reinforce effective team practices. Our interface accelerates the discovery of practices in situ and then guides them in reinforcing and applying these practices to future tasks. We conducted a between-subjects experiment (N=75) to assess our design with crowdworkers from the Amazon Mechanical Turk platform. This randomized controlled experiment showed that teams using our system for approximately six minutes of collaborative reflection were able to discover effective practices more successfully and had significantly improved team performance and viability. These results indicate that deliberate support for improving team practices can improve outcomes even through very short interaction. We conclude with design implications and opportunities for future work.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cfac28d4-52c9-4d43-893d-430dcdb3e293Cited by top-tier papers2
- Are We On Track? AI-Assisted Active and Passive Goal Reflection During MeetingsXinyue Chen, Lev Tankelevitch, Rishi Vanukuru, Ava Elizabeth Scott et al.CHI 2025 · 23 citations
- GroundLink: Exploring How Contextual Meeting Snippets Can Close Common Ground Gaps in Editing 3D Scenes for Virtual ProductionGun Woo (Warren) Park, Frederik Brudy, George W. Fitzmaurice, Fraser AndersonCHI 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on7
- How AI Developers Overcome Communication Challenges in a Multidisciplinary Team: A Case StudyDavid Piorkowski, Soya Park, April Yi Wang, Dakuo Wang et al.CSCW 2021 · 142 citations
- Understanding the Telework Experience of People with DisabilitiesJohn C. TangCSCW 2021 · 107 citations
- Making it Work, or Not: A Longitudinal Study of Career Trajectories Among Online FreelancersAllie Blaising, Yasmine Kotturi, Chinmay Kulkarni, Laura DabbishCSCW 2020 · 55 citations
- My Team Will Go On: Differentiating High and Low Viability Teams through Team InteractionHancheng Cao, Vivian Yang, Victor Chen, Yu Jin Lee et al.CSCW 2020 · 37 citations
- Think-Aloud Computing: Supporting Rich and Low-Effort Knowledge CaptureRebecca Krosnick, Fraser Anderson, Justin Matejka, Steve Oney et al.CHI 2021 · 17 citations
Related papers
- Being a Solo Endeavor or Team Worker in Crowdsourcing Contests? It is a Long-term Decision You Need to MakeKeman Huang, Jilei Zhou, Shao ChenCSCW 2022 · 7 citations
- The Effectiveness of Peer Prediction in Long-Term ForecastingDebmalya Mandal, Goran Radanovic, David C. ParkesAAAI 2020 · 13 citations
- Sorry, Your HIT Is Overbooked - Investigating the Use of Crowdsourcing HIT CatchersEddy Maddalena, Alessandro Checco, Haoyu Xie, Efpraxia D. Zamani et al.CSCW 2025 · 2 citations
- Improving Worker Engagement Through Conversational Microtask CrowdsourcingSihang Qiu, Ujwal Gadiraju, Alessandro BozzonCHI 2020 · 66 citations
- Chatbots in Collaborative Settings and their Impact on Virtual TeamworkClélie Amiot, François Charoy, Jérôme DinetCSCW 2025 · 6 citations
