Representation-Based Exploration for Language Models: From Test-Time to Post-Training
Jens Tuyls, Dylan J Foster, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Jordan T. Ash
Abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) promises to expand the capabilities of language models, but it is unclear if current RL techniques promote the discovery of novel behaviors, or simply sharpen those already present in the base model. In this paper, we investigate the value of deliberate exploration---explicitly incentivizing the model to discover novel and diverse behaviors---and aim to understand how the knowledge in pre-trained models can guide this search. Our main finding is that exploration with a simple, principled, representation-based bonus derived from the pre-trained language model's hidden states significantly improves diversity and pass@k rates---both for post-training, and in a novel inference-time scaling setting we introduce. (1) For inference-time, exploration with representation-based diversity improves efficiency, consistently improving pass@k rates across a variety of models and reasoning tasks. For example, for Qwen-2.5-14b-Instruct we obtain over 50% improvement in verifier efficiency on almost all considered tasks. (2) For post-training, we show that integrating this exploration strategy into an RL pipeline improves reasoning performance over that of the initial model and over standard RL post-training. For example, on AIME 2024, our post-trained Qwen-2.5-7b-Instruct's pass@80 matches the pass@256 of GRPO on the same model, demonstrating a 3x improvement in test-time sample efficiency. Overall, our findings suggest that deliberate exploration---with the right notion of diversity---is a practical path toward discovery of new behaviors beyond sharpening.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cf9788b6-ade7-46b6-a4df-5bbbcd4debcfCited by top-tier papers2
- Maximum Likelihood Reinforcement LearningFahim Tajwar, Guanning Zeng, Yueer Zhou, Yuda Song et al.ICML 2026 · 18 citations
- Rubric Curriculum RL: Exploiting the Generation-Verification Gap in Non-Verifiable DomainsTejas Krishnan, Sumeet Motwani, Charles London, Suhaas Bhat et al.ICML 2026
Builds on31
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at ScaleQiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2,828 citations
- Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code GenerationJiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 2,317 citations
Related papers
- TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement LearningYuxin Zuo, Kaiyan Zhang, Li Sheng, Shang Qu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 249 citations
- RLP: Reinforcement as a Pretraining ObjectiveAli Hatamizadeh, Syeda Nahida Akter, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Jan Kautz et al.ICLR 2026 · 26 citations
- MetaAct-RL: Training Language Models for Reasoning Through Meta-Action-Based Reinforcement LearningZhiheng Xi, Yuhui Wang, Yiwen Ding, Guanyu Li et al.AAAI 2026
- Scaling Behaviors of LLM Reinforcement Learning Post-Training: An Empirical Study in Mathematical ReasoningZelin Tan, Hejia Geng, Xiaohang Yu, Mulei Zhang et al.ACL 2026 · 17 citations
- Incentivizing LLMs to Self-Verify Their AnswersFuxiang Zhang, Jiacheng Xu, Chaojie Wang, Ce Cui et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 20 citations
