He-HTLC: Revisiting Incentives in HTLC
Sarisht Wadhwa, Jannis Stoeter, Fan Zhang, Kartik Nayak
Abstract
—Hashed Time-Locked Contracts (HTLCs) are a widely used primitive in blockchain systems such as payment channels, atomic swaps, etc. Unfortunately, HTLC is incentive- incompatible and is vulnerable to bribery attacks. The state-of-the-art solution is MAD-HTLC (Oakland’21), which proposes an elegant idea that leverages miners’ profit-driven nature to defeat bribery attacks. In this paper, we show that MAD-HTLC is still vulnerable as it only considers a somewhat narrow set of passive strategies by miners. Through a family of novel reverse-bribery attacks, we show concrete active strategies that miners can take to break MAD-HTLC and profit at the loss of MAD-HTLC users. For these attacks, we present their implementation and game-theoretical profitability analysis. Based on the learnings from our attacks, we propose a new HTLC realization, He-HTLC , 1 that is provably secure against all possible strategic manipulation (passive and active). In ad- dition to being secure in a stronger adversary model, He-HTLC achieves other desirable features such as low and user-adjustable collateral, making it more practical to implement and use that proposed schemes. We implemented He-HTLC on Bitcoin and the transaction cost of He-HTLC is comparative to average Bitcoin transaction fees.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cf2e5291-c491-47a8-a1f6-c42460c3d684Cited by top-tier papers3
- Payout Races and Congested Channels: A Formal Analysis of Security in the Lightning NetworkBen Weintraub, Satwik Prabhu Kumble, Cristina Nita-Rotaru, Stefanie RoosCCS 2024 · 5 citations
- Securing Lightning Channels against Rational MinersLukas Aumayr, Zeta Avarikioti, Matteo Maffei, Subhra MazumdarCCS 2024 · 4 citations
- Ark: Offchain Transaction Batching in BitcoinPim Keer, Matteo Maffei, Marco Argentieri, Andrew Camilleri et al.CCS 2026
Builds on4
- Flash Boys 2.0: Frontrunning in Decentralized Exchanges, Miner Extractable Value, and Consensus InstabilityPhilip Daian, Steven Goldfeder, Tyler Kell, Yunqi Li et al.S&P 2020 · 607 citations
- Zero-Knowledge Contingent Payments Revisited: Attacks and Payments for ServicesMatteo Campanelli, Rosario Gennaro, Steven Goldfeder, Luca NizzardoCCS 2017 · 170 citations
- MAD-HTLC: Because HTLC is Crazy-Cheap to AttackItay Tsabary, Matan Yechieli, Alex Manuskin, Ittay EyalS&P 2021 · 87 citations
- Tesseract: Real-Time Cryptocurrency Exchange Using Trusted HardwareIddo Bentov, Yan Ji, Fan Zhang, Lorenz Breidenbach et al.CCS 2019 · 70 citations
Related papers
- Blitz: Secure Multi-Hop Payments Without Two-Phase CommitsLukas Aumayr, Pedro Moreno-Sanchez, Aniket Kate, Matteo MaffeiUSENIX Security 2021 · 63 citations
- Mad-Dag: Protecting Blockchain Consensus From MEVRoi Bar Zur, Ittay Eyal, Aviv TamarS&P 2026 · 3 citations
- Resilient Alerting Protocols for BlockchainsMarwa Mouallem, Lorenz Breidenbach, Ittay Eyal, Ari JuelsCCS 2026
- Blockchain Bribing Attacks and the Efficacy of CounterincentivesDimitris Karakostas, Aggelos Kiayias, Thomas ZachariasCCS 2024 · 5 citations
- TARDIS: A Foundation of Time-Lock Puzzles in UCCarsten Baum, Bernardo David, Rafael Dowsley, Jesper Buus Nielsen et al.EUROCRYPT 2021 · 42 citations
