Mad-Dag: Protecting Blockchain Consensus From MEV
Roi Bar Zur, Ittay Eyal, Aviv Tamar
Abstract
Blockchain security is threatened by selfish mining, where a miner (operator) deviates from the protocol to increase their revenue. Selfish mining is exacerbated by adverse conditions: rushing (network propagation advantage for the selfish miner), varying block rewards due to block contents, called miner extractable value (MEV), and petty-compliant miners who accept bribes from the selfish miner.
The state-of-the-art selfish-mining-resistant blockchain protocol, Colordag, does not treat these adverse conditions and was proven secure only when its latency is impractically high.
We present MAD-DAG, Mutual-Assured-Destruction Directed-Acyclic-Graph, the first practical protocol to counter selfish mining under adverse conditions. MAD-DAG achieves this thanks to its novel ledger function, which discards the contents of equal-length chains competing to be the longest.
We analyze selfish mining in both Colordag and MAD-DAG by modeling a rational miner using a Markov Decision Process (MDP). We obtain a tractable model for both by developing conservative reward rules that favor the selfish miner to yield an upper bound on selfish mining revenue. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first tractable model of selfish mining in a practical DAG-based blockchain. This enables us to obtain a lower bound on the security threshold, the minimum fraction of computational power a miner needs in order to profit from selfish mining.
MAD-DAG withstands adverse conditions under which Colordag and Bitcoin fail, while otherwise maintaining comparable security. For example, with petty-compliant miners and high levels of block reward variability, MAD-DAG's security threshold ranges from 11% to 31%, whereas both Colordag and Bitcoin achieve 0% for all levels.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 943233b6-dfd9-45ad-84a5-05757ad88a63Builds on16
- On the Security and Performance of Proof of Work BlockchainsArthur Gervais, Ghassan O. Karame, Karl Wüst, Vasileios Glykantzis et al.CCS 2016 · 1,668 citations
- Flash Boys 2.0: Frontrunning in Decentralized Exchanges, Miner Extractable Value, and Consensus InstabilityPhilip Daian, Steven Goldfeder, Tyler Kell, Yunqi Li et al.S&P 2020 · 607 citations
- On the Instability of Bitcoin Without the Block RewardMiles Carlsten, Harry A. Kalodner, S. Matthew Weinberg, Arvind NarayananCCS 2016 · 387 citations
- Quantifying Blockchain Extractable Value: How dark is the forest?Kaihua Qin, Liyi Zhou, Arthur GervaisS&P 2022 · 336 citations
- Narwhal and Tusk: a DAG-based mempool and efficient BFT consensusGeorge Danezis, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Alberto Sonnino, Alexander SpiegelmanEuroSys 2022 · 259 citations
Related papers
- Security-Performance Tradeoff in DAG-based Proof-of-Work Blockchain ProtocolsShichen Wu, Puwen Wei, Ren Zhang, Bowen JiangNDSS 2024
- MAD-HTLC: Because HTLC is Crazy-Cheap to AttackItay Tsabary, Matan Yechieli, Alex Manuskin, Ittay EyalS&P 2021 · 87 citations
- Modeling the Impact of Network Connectivity on Consensus Security of Proof-of-Work BlockchainYang Xiao, Ning Zhang, Wenjing Lou, Y. Thomas HouINFOCOM 2020 · 52 citations
- BDoS: Blockchain Denial-of-ServiceMichael Mirkin, Yan Ji, Jonathan Pang, Ariah Klages-Mundt et al.CCS 2020 · 1 citation
- Tight Consistency Bounds for BitcoinPeter Gazi, Aggelos Kiayias, Alexander RussellCCS 2020
