Concept Incongruence: An Exploration of Time and Death in Role Playing
Xiaoyan Bai, Ike Peng, Aditya Singh, Chenhao Tan
Abstract
Consider this prompt "Draw a unicorn with two horns". Should large language models (LLMs) recognize that a unicorn has only one horn by definition and ask users for clarifications, or proceed to generate something anyway? We introduce concept incongruence to capture such phenomena where concept boundaries clash with each other, either in user prompts or in model representations, often leading to under-specified or mis-specified behaviors. In this work, we take the first step towards defining and analyzing model behavior under concept incongruence. Focusing on temporal boundaries in the ROLE-PLAY setting, we propose three behavioral metrics-abstention rate, conditional accuracy, and answer rate-to quantify model behavior under incongruence due to the role's death. We show that models fail to abstain after death and suffer from an accuracy drop compared to the NON-ROLE-PLAY setting. Through probing experiments, we identify two main causes: (i) unreliable encoding of the "death" state across different years, leading to unsatisfactory abstention behavior, and (ii) role playing causes shifts in the model's temporal representations, resulting in accuracy drops. We leverage these insights to improve consistency in the model's abstention and answer behaviors. Our findings suggest that concept incongruence leads to unexpected model behaviors and point to future directions on improving model behavior under concept incongruence. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on15
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
- Retrieval Augmented Language Model Pre-TrainingKelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Zora Tung, Panupong Pasupat et al.ICML 2020 · 2,937 citations
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language ModelsAngeliki Lazaridou, Adhiguna Kuncoro, Elena Gribovskaya, Devang Agrawal et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 315 citations
Related papers
- Intuitive or Dependent? Investigating LLMs' Behavior Style to Conflicting PromptsJiahao Ying, Yixin Cao, Kai Xiong, Long Cui et al.ACL 2024
- Improving Language Models' Meaning Understanding and Consistency by Learning Conceptual Roles from DictionaryMyeongjun Jang, Thomas LukasiewiczEMNLP 2023 · 1 citation
- TruthRL: Incentivizing Truthful LLMs via Reinforcement LearningZhepei Wei, Xiao Yang, Kai Sun, Jiaqi Wang et al.ICML 2026
- CondAmbigQA: A Benchmark and Dataset for Conditional Ambiguous Question AnsweringZongxi Li, Yang Li, Haoran Xie, S. Joe QinEMNLP 2025
- The Illusion of Role Separation: Hidden Shortcuts in LLM Role Learning (and How to Fix Them)Zihao Wang, Yibo Jiang, Jiahao Yu, Heqing HuangICML 2025
