Paladin: Defending LLM-enabled Phishing Emails with a New Trigger-Tag Paradigm
Yan Pang, Wenlong Meng, Xiaojing Liao, Tianhao Wang
Abstract
With the rapid development of large language models, the potential threat of their malicious use, particularly in generating phishing content, is becoming increasingly prevalent. Leveraging the capabilities of LLMs, malicious users can synthesize phishing emails that are free from spelling mistakes and other easily detectable features. Furthermore, such models can generate topic-specific phishing messages, tailoring content to the target domain and increasing the likelihood of success. Detecting such content remains a significant challenge, as LLM-generated phishing emails often lack clear or distinguishable linguistic features. As a result, most existing semantic-level detection approaches struggle to identify them reliably. While certain LLM-based detection methods have shown promise, they suffer from high computational costs and are constrained by the performance of the underlying language model, making them impractical for large-scale deployment. In this work, we aim to address this issue. We propose Paladin, which embeds trigger-tag associations into vanilla LLM using various insertion strategies, creating them into instrumented LLMs. When an instrumented LLM generates content related to phishing, it will automatically include detectable tags, enabling easier identification. Based on the design on implicit and explicit triggers and tags, we consider four distinct scenarios in our work. We evaluate our method from three key perspectives: stealthiness, effectiveness, and robustness, and compare it with existing baseline methods. Experimental results show that our method outperforms the baselines, achieving over 90% detection accuracy across all scenarios. We share our code at [1].
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ce580aff-c2af-40dd-977c-6d65c3e91b89Builds on48
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!Xiangyu Qi, Yi Zeng, Tinghao Xie, Pin-Yu Chen et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,104 citations
- HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust RefusalMantas Mazeika, Long Phan, Xuwang Yin, Andy Zou et al.ICML 2024 · 1,031 citations
Related papers
- A Large-Scale Study of Personalized Phishing using Large Language ModelsStefan Czybik, Anne Josiane Kouam, Peter Heubl, Jan Magnus Nold et al.USENIX Security 2026 · 1 citation
- From Chatbots to Phishbots?: Phishing Scam Generation in Commercial Large Language ModelsSayak Saha Roy, Poojitha Thota, Krishna Vamsi Naragam, Shirin NilizadehS&P 2024 · 57 citations
- PiMRef: Deducing Ever-evolving Spear-phishing Emails with Knowledge Base InvariantsRuofan Liu, Yun Lin, Yuxin Wang, Xiwen Teoh et al.CCS 2026 · 4 citations
- TrojLLM: A Black-box Trojan Prompt Attack on Large Language ModelsJiaqi Xue, Mengxin Zheng, Ting Hua, Yilin Shen et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 63 citations
- Efficient Detection of Toxic Prompts in Large Language ModelsYi Liu, Junzhe Yu, Huijia Sun, Ling Shi et al.ASE 2024 · 6 citations
