From Chatbots to Phishbots?: Phishing Scam Generation in Commercial Large Language Models
Sayak Saha Roy, Poojitha Thota, Krishna Vamsi Naragam, Shirin Nilizadeh
Abstract
The advanced capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) have made them invaluable across various applications, from conversational agents and content creation to data analysis, research, and innovation. However, their effectiveness and accessibility also render them susceptible to abuse for generating malicious content, including phishing attacks. This study explores the potential of using four popular commercially available LLMs, i.e., ChatGPT (GPT 3.5 Turbo), GPT 4, Claude, and Bard, to generate functional phishing attacks using a series of malicious prompts. We discover that these LLMs can generate both phishing websites and emails that can convincingly imitate well-known brands and also deploy a range of evasive tactics that are used to elude detection mechanisms employed by anti-phishing systems. These attacks can be generated using unmodified or "vanilla" versions of these LLMs without requiring any prior adversarial exploits such as jailbreaking. We evaluate the performance of the LLMs towards generating these attacks and find that they can also be utilized to create malicious prompts that, in turn, can be fed back to the model to generate phishing scams - thus massively reducing the prompt-engineering effort required by attackers to scale these threats. As a countermeasure, we build a BERT-based automated detection tool that can be used for the early detection of malicious prompts to prevent LLMs from generating phishing content. Our model is transferable across all four commercial LLMs, attaining an average accuracy of 96% for phishing website prompts and 94% for phishing email prompts. We also disclose the vulnerabilities to the concerned LLMs, with Google acknowledging it as a severe issue. Our detection model is available for use at Hugging Face, as well as a ChatGPT Actions plugin.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get fc11e438-e533-4f92-8e0a-77918a151fe9Cited by top-tier papers16
- Incalmo: an Autonomous Llm-Assisted System for Red Teaming Multi-Host NetworksBrian Singer, Keane Lucas, Lakshmi Adiga, Meghna Jain et al.S&P 2026 · 29 citations
- Chasing Shadows: Pitfalls in LLM Security ResearchJonathan Evertz, Niklas Risse, Nicolai Neuer, Andreas Müller et al.NDSS 2026 · 17 citations
- TAPE: Tailored Posterior Difference for Auditing of Machine UnlearningWeiqi Wang, Zhiyi Tian, An Liu, Shui YuWWW 2025 · 9 citations
- GAVEL: Towards Rule-Based Safety through Activation MonitoringShir Rozenfeld, Rahul Pankajakshan, Itay Zloczower, Eyal Lenga et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- PiMRef: Deducing Ever-evolving Spear-phishing Emails with Knowledge Base InvariantsRuofan Liu, Yun Lin, Yuxin Wang, Xiwen Teoh et al.CCS 2026 · 4 citations
Related papers
- Scam2Prompt: A Scalable Framework for Auditing Malicious Scam Endpoints in Production LLMsZhiyang Chen, Tara Saba, Xun Deng, Xujie Si et al.ICML 2026
- Evaluating LLM-based Personal Information Extraction and CountermeasuresYupei Liu, Yuqi Jia, Jinyuan Jia, Neil Zhenqiang GongUSENIX Security 2025
- MASTERKEY: Automated Jailbreaking of Large Language Model ChatbotsGelei Deng, Yi Liu, Yuekang Li, Kailong Wang et al.NDSS 2024
- A Large-Scale Study of Personalized Phishing using Large Language ModelsStefan Czybik, Anne Josiane Kouam, Peter Heubl, Jan Magnus Nold et al.USENIX Security 2026 · 1 citation
- "Do Anything Now": Characterizing and Evaluating In-The-Wild Jailbreak Prompts on Large Language ModelsXinyue Shen, Zeyuan Chen, Michael Backes, Yun Shen et al.CCS 2024 · 132 citations
