StarryThoughts: Facilitating Diverse Opinion Exploration on Social Issues
Hyunwoo Kim, Haesoo Kim, Kyung Je Jo, Juho Kim
Abstract
Enabling the free and equal exchange of arguments on social issues in a respectful manner is an integral part of establishing the democratic ideal. However, the current manifestation of online spaces tends to facilitate the gathering of like-minded people, leading to the polarization of opinions. Such polarization inhibits the sharing of diverse opinions and deteriorates respect for disagreeing opinions. To tackle this issue, we present StarryThoughts, an online system that supports users to express and explore diverse perspectives on social issues. The system supports three types of exploration of the collected arguments online: navigating opinions based on the demographic identities of the posters, checking the the stereotypes users hold towards demographics in relation to given social issues, and engaging with opinions with semantically different pointof-views. By deploying the system to the public in co-operation with a nationwide broadcasting company, we collected 1,950 opinions with 144 free-form responses from 1,209 visitors as initial data and iterated on the design. Results from a user study with 56 participants showed that the system enables participants to explore a wide range of opinions on social issues, be more informed on the various arguments, and be more confident about their opinions. From our findings, we provide several design considerations for building online systems for supporting users to explore diverse opinions on social issues. CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Collaborative and social computing systems and tools.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cdc505e7-4b89-4b67-ab7b-a2195edd97ceCited by top-tier papers8
- Debate Chatbots to Facilitate Critical Thinking on YouTube: Social Identity and Conversational Style Make A DifferenceThitaree Tanprasert, Sidney S. Fels, Luanne Sinnamon, Dongwook YoonCHI 2024 · 51 citations
- PolicyCraft: Supporting Collaborative and Participatory Policy Design through Case-Grounded DeliberationTzu-Sheng Kuo, Quan Ze Chen, Amy X. Zhang, Jane Hsieh et al.CHI 2025 · 26 citations
- The Politics of Fear and the Experience of Bangladeshi Religious Minority Communities Using Social Media PlatformsMohammad Rashidujjaman Rifat, Dipto Das, Arpon Podder, Mahiratul Jannat et al.CSCW 2024 · 12 citations
- Exploring the Effects of Event-induced Sudden Influx of Newcomers to Online Pop Music Fandom Communities: Content, Interaction, and EngagementQingyu Guo, Chuhan Shi, Zhuohao Yin, Chengzhong Liu et al.CSCW 2023 · 7 citations
- Enhancing Deliberativeness: Evaluating the Impact of Multimodal Reflection NudgesShunYi Yeo, Zhuoqun Jiang, Anthony Tang, Simon Tangi PerraultCHI 2025 · 7 citations
Related papers
- Fostering Collective Discourse: A Distributed Role-Based Approach to Online News CommentingYoo Jin Hong, Yersultan Doszhan, Joseph SeeringCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- HearHere: Mitigating Echo Chambers in News Consumption through an AI-based Web SystemYoungseung Jeon, Jaehoon Kim, Sohyun Park, Yun-Yong Ko et al.CSCW 2024 · 9 citations
- Party Politics, Values and the Design of Social Media Services: Implications of political elites' values and ideologies to mitigating of political polarisation through designKirsikka Grön, Matti NelimarkkaCSCW 2020 · 22 citations
- Modeling the Impact of Timeline Algorithms on Opinion Dynamics Using Low-rank UpdatesTianyi Zhou, Stefan Neumann, Kiran Garimella, Aristides GionisWWW 2024 · 7 citations
- Redistrict: Online Public Deliberation Support that Connects and Rebuilds Inclusive CommunitiesAndreea Sistrunk, Nathan Self, Subhodip Biswas, Kurt Luther et al.CSCW 2024 · 5 citations
