USENIX Security2023Top-tier venue
Tight Auditing of Differentially Private Machine Learning
Milad Nasr, Jamie Hayes, Thomas Steinke, Borja Balle, Florian Tramèr, Matthew Jagielski, Nicholas Carlini, Andreas Terzis
Abstract
This paper presents an auditing procedure for the Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) algorithm in the black-box threat model that is substantially tighter than prior work. The main intuition is to craft worst-case initial model parameters, as DP-SGD's privacy analysis is agnostic to the choice of the initial model parameters. For models trained on MNIST and CIFAR-10 at theoretical , our auditing procedure yields empirical estimates of and , respectively, on a 1,000-record sample and and on the full datasets. By contrast, previous audits were only (relatively) tight in stronger white-box models, where the adversary can access the model's inner parameters and insert arbitrary gradients. Overall, our auditing procedure can offer valuable insight into how the privacy analysis of DP-SGD could be improved and detect bugs and DP violations in real-world implementations. The source code needed to reproduce our experiments is available at https://github.com/spalabucr/bb-audit-dpsgd.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cd1a0559-c4e2-406f-bf65-edb4e102d2e2Cited by top-tier papers56
- Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language ModelsWeijia Shi, Anirudh Ajith, Mengzhou Xia, Yangsibo Huang et al.ICLR 2024 · 365 citations
- Privacy Auditing with One (1) Training RunThomas Steinke, Milad Nasr, Matthew JagielskiNeurIPS 2023 · 178 citations
- Label Poisoning is All You NeedRishi D. Jha, Jonathan Hayase, Sewoong OhNeurIPS 2023 · 58 citations
- Privacy Side Channels in Machine Learning SystemsEdoardo Debenedetti, Giorgio Severi, Milad Nasr, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 52 citations
- One-shot Empirical Privacy Estimation for Federated LearningGalen Andrew, Peter Kairouz, Sewoong Oh, Alina Oprea et al.ICLR 2024 · 48 citations
Builds on15
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Comprehensive Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning: Passive and Active White-box Inference Attacks against Centralized and Federated LearningMilad Nasr, Reza Shokri, Amir HoumansadrS&P 2019 · 1,778 citations
- The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, Chang Liu, Úlfar Erlingsson, Jernej Kos et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 1,386 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks From First PrinciplesNicholas Carlini, Steve Chien, Milad Nasr, Shuang Song et al.S&P 2022 · 1,049 citations
Related papers
- Nearly Tight Black-Box Auditing of Differentially Private Machine LearningMeenatchi Sundaram Muthu Selva Annamalai, Emiliano De CristofaroNeurIPS 2024 · 32 citations
- Optimizing Canaries for Privacy Auditing with Metagradient DescentMatteo Boglioni, Terrance Liu, Andrew Ilyas, Steven WuICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- Revisiting Differentially Private Hyper-parameter TuningZihang Xiang, Tianhao Wang, Cheng-Long Wang, Di WangNDSS 2026 · 7 citations
- "What do you want from theory alone?" Experimenting with Tight Auditing of Differentially Private Synthetic Data GenerationMeenatchi Sundaram Muthu Selva Annamalai, Georgi Ganev, Emiliano De CristofaroUSENIX Security 2024 · 24 citations
- Tighter Privacy Auditing of DP-SGD in the Hidden State Threat ModelTudor Ioan Cebere, Aurélien Bellet, Nicolas PapernotICLR 2025 · 1 citation
