Optimal Estimation of Policy Gradient via Double Fitted Iteration
Chengzhuo Ni, Ruiqi Zhang, Xiang Ji, Xuezhou Zhang, Mengdi Wang
Abstract
Policy gradient (PG) estimation becomes a challenge when we are not allowed to sample with the target policy but only have access to a dataset generated by some unknown behavior policy. Conventional methods for off-policy PG estimation often suffer from either significant bias or exponentially large variance. In this paper, we propose the double Fitted PG estimation (FPG) algorithm. FPG can work with an arbitrary policy parameterization, assuming access to a Bellman-complete value function class. In the case of linear value function approximation, we provide a tight finitesample upper bound on policy gradient estimation error, that is governed by the amount of distribution mismatch measured in feature space. We also establish the asymptotic normality of FPG estimation error with a precise covariance characterization, which is further shown to be statistically optimal with a matching Cramer-Rao lower bound. Empirically, we evaluate the performance of FPG on both policy gradient estimation and policy optimization, using either softmax tabular or ReLU policy networks. Under various metrics, our results show that FPG significantly outperforms existing off-policy PG estimation methods based on importance sampling and variance reduction techniques.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cc178049-c90b-4c6f-b434-82c275db6d4eCited by top-tier papers2
- Occupancy-based Policy Gradient: Estimation, Convergence, and OptimalityAudrey Huang, Nan JiangNeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations
- A Policy Gradient Method for Confounded POMDPsMao Hong, Zhengling Qi, Yanxun XuICLR 2024 · 5 citations
Builds on16
- Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?Ying Jin, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran WangICML 2021 · 419 citations
- Bridging Offline Reinforcement Learning and Imitation Learning: A Tale of PessimismParia Rashidinejad, Banghua Zhu, Cong Ma, Jiantao Jiao et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 373 citations
- Bellman-consistent Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement LearningTengyang Xie, Ching-An Cheng, Nan Jiang, Paul Mineiro et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 339 citations
- What are the Statistical Limits of Offline RL with Linear Function Approximation?Ruosong Wang, Dean P. Foster, Sham M. KakadeICLR 2021 · 172 citations
- Variational Policy Gradient Method for Reinforcement Learning with General UtilitiesJunyu Zhang, Alec Koppel, Amrit Singh Bedi, Csaba Szepesvári et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 170 citations
Related papers
- From Importance Sampling to Doubly Robust Policy GradientJiawei Huang, Nan JiangICML 2020 · 26 citations
- Statistically Efficient Off-Policy Policy GradientsNathan Kallus, Masatoshi UeharaICML 2020 · 43 citations
- An Improved Analysis of (Variance-Reduced) Policy Gradient and Natural Policy Gradient MethodsYanli Liu, Kaiqing Zhang, Tamer Basar, Wotao YinNeurIPS 2020 · 128 citations
- Off-Policy Fitted Q-Evaluation with Differentiable Function Approximators: Z-Estimation and Inference TheoryRuiqi Zhang, Xuezhou Zhang, Chengzhuo Ni, Mengdi WangICML 2022 · 20 citations
- Distributional Offline Policy Evaluation with Predictive Error GuaranteesRunzhe Wu, Masatoshi Uehara, Wen SunICML 2023 · 19 citations
