Cross-Entropy Is All You Need To Invert the Data Generating Process
Patrik Reizinger, Alice Bizeul, Attila Juhos, Julia E. Vogt, Randall Balestriero, Wieland Brendel, David A. Klindt
Abstract
Supervised learning has become a cornerstone of modern machine learning, yet a comprehensive theory explaining its effectiveness remains elusive. Empirical phenomena, such as neural analogy-making and the linear representation hypothesis, suggest that supervised models can learn interpretable factors of variation in a linear fashion. Recent advances in self-supervised learning, particularly nonlinear Independent Component Analysis, have shown that these methods can recover latent structures by inverting the data generating process. We extend these identifiability results to parametric instance discrimination, then show how insights transfer to the ubiquitous setting of supervised learning with cross-entropy minimization. We prove that even in standard classification tasks, models learn representations of ground-truth factors of variation up to a linear transformation under a certain DGP. We corroborate our theoretical contribution with a series of empirical studies. First, using simulated data matching our theoretical assumptions, we demonstrate successful disentanglement of latent factors. Second, we show that on DisLib, a widely-used disentanglement benchmark, simple classification tasks recover latent structures up to linear transformations. Finally, we reveal that models trained on ImageNet encode representations that permit linear decoding of proxy factors of variation. Together, our theoretical findings and experiments offer a compelling explanation for recent observations of linear representations, such as superposition in neural networks. This work takes a significant step toward a cohesive theory that accounts for the unreasonable effectiveness of supervised learning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cbb1fe83-3209-43e6-8a04-c5495feb901cCited by top-tier papers10
- InfoNCE Induces Gaussian DistributionRoy Betser, Eyal Gofer, Meir Yossef Levi, Guy GilboaICLR 2026 · 17 citations
- Learning Interactive World Model for Object-Centric Reinforcement LearningFan Feng, Phillip Lippe, Sara MagliacaneNeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- When Does Closeness in Distribution Imply Representational Similarity? An Identifiability PerspectiveBeatrix M. G. Nielsen, Emanuele Marconato, Andrea Dittadi, Luigi GreseleNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Connecting Neural Models Latent Geometries with Relative Geodesic RepresentationsHanlin Yu, Berfin Inal, Georgios Arvanitidis, Søren Hauberg et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- Skill Learning via Policy Diversity Yields Identifiable Representations for Reinforcement LearningPatrik Reizinger, Bálint Mucsányi, Siyuan Guo, Benjamin Eysenbach et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
Builds on18
- Understanding Dimensional Collapse in Contrastive Self-supervised LearningLi Jing, Pascal Vincent, Yann LeCun, Yuandong TianICLR 2022 · 467 citations
- The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language ModelsKiho Park, Yo Joong Choe, Victor VeitchICML 2024 · 461 citations
- Self-Supervised Learning with Data Augmentations Provably Isolates Content from StyleJulius von Kügelgen, Yash Sharma, Luigi Gresele, Wieland Brendel et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 421 citations
- Contrastive Learning Inverts the Data Generating ProcessRoland S. Zimmermann, Yash Sharma, Steffen Schneider, Matthias Bethge et al.ICML 2021 · 264 citations
- Contrastive and Non-Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning Recover Global and Local Spectral Embedding MethodsRandall Balestriero, Yann LeCunNeurIPS 2022 · 189 citations
Related papers
- Statistical and structural identifiability in representation learningWalter Nelson, Marco Fumero, Theofanis Karaletsos, Francesco LocatelloICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- On Linear Identifiability of Learned RepresentationsGeoffrey Roeder, Luke Metz, Durk KingmaICML 2021 · 107 citations
- On Finite-Sample Identifiability of Contrastive Learning-Based Nonlinear Independent Component AnalysisQi Lyu, Xiao FuICML 2022 · 6 citations
- Embrace the Gap: VAEs Perform Independent Mechanism AnalysisPatrik Reizinger, Luigi Gresele, Jack Brady, Julius von Kügelgen et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 34 citations
- Additive Decoders for Latent Variables Identification and Cartesian-Product ExtrapolationSébastien Lachapelle, Divyat Mahajan, Ioannis Mitliagkas, Simon Lacoste-JulienNeurIPS 2023 · 61 citations
