Weighted Policy Constraints for Offline Reinforcement Learning
Zhiyong Peng, Changlin Han, Yadong Liu, Zongtan Zhou
Abstract
Offline reinforcement learning (RL) aims to learn policy from the passively collected offline dataset. Applying existing RL methods on the static dataset straightforwardly will raise distribution shift, causing these unconstrained RL methods to fail. To cope with the distribution shift problem, a common practice in offline RL is to constrain the policy explicitly or implicitly close to behavioral policy. However, the available dataset usually contains sub-optimal or inferior actions, constraining the policy near all these actions will make the policy inevitably learn inferior behaviors, limiting the performance of the algorithm. Based on this observation, we propose a weighted policy constraints (wPC) method that only constrains the learned policy to desirable behaviors, making room for policy improvement on other parts. Our algorithm outperforms existing state-of-the-art offline RL algorithms on the D4RL offline gym datasets. Moreover, the proposed algorithm is simple to implement with few hyper-parameters, making the proposed wPC algorithm a robust offline RL method with low computational complexity.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cb637531-47bb-41ef-83dd-15cfea8c20f8Cited by top-tier papers4
- Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning from Low Quality DataScott R. Jeen, Tom Bewley, Jonathan M. CullenNeurIPS 2024 · 24 citations
- A2PO: Towards Effective Offline Reinforcement Learning from an Advantage-aware PerspectiveYunpeng Qing, Shunyu Liu, Jingyuan Cong, Kaixuan Chen et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 16 citations
- Adaptive Scaling of Policy Constraints for Offline Reinforcement LearningJing Tan, Xiaorui Li, Chao Yao, Xiaojuan Ban et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Expected Returns and Policy Inconsistency-Aware Offline Federated Deep Reinforcement LearningMeng XU, Zhongying Chen, Weiwei Fu, Yan Li et al.ICML 2026
Builds on9
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence ModelingLili Chen, Kevin Lu, Aravind Rajeswaran, Kimin Lee et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 2,557 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Fisher Divergence Critic RegularizationIlya Kostrikov, Rob Fergus, Jonathan Tompson, Ofir NachumICML 2021 · 350 citations
- Keep Doing What Worked: Behavior Modelling Priors for Offline Reinforcement LearningNoah Y. Siegel, Jost Tobias Springenberg, Felix Berkenkamp, Abbas Abdolmaleki et al.ICLR 2020 · 299 citations
- RvS: What is Essential for Offline RL via Supervised Learning?Scott Emmons, Benjamin Eysenbach, Ilya Kostrikov, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 225 citations
Related papers
- Efficient Offline Reinforcement Learning via Peer-Influenced ConstraintYujia Zhang, Lin Li, Wei Wei, Jianguo Wu et al.ICLR 2026
- Constraints Penalized Q-learning for Safe Offline Reinforcement LearningHaoran Xu, Xianyuan Zhan, Xiangyu ZhuAAAI 2022 · 127 citations
- Mildly Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningJiafei Lyu, Xiaoteng Ma, Xiu Li, Zongqing LuNeurIPS 2022 · 173 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Closed-Form Policy Improvement OperatorsJiachen Li, Edwin Zhang, Ming Yin, Qinxun Bai et al.ICML 2023 · 18 citations
- Beyond Uniform Sampling: Offline Reinforcement Learning with Imbalanced DatasetsZhang-Wei Hong, Aviral Kumar, Sathwik Karnik, Abhishek Bhandwaldar et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 34 citations
