Simulating Human-like Daily Activities with Desire-driven Autonomy
Yiding Wang, Yuxuan Chen, Fangwei Zhong, Long Ma, Yizhou Wang
Abstract
Desires motivate humans to interact autonomously with the complex world. In contrast, current AI agents require explicit task specifications, such as instructions or reward functions, which constrain their autonomy and behavioral diversity. In this paper, we introduce a Desire-driven Autonomous Agent (D2A) that can enable a large language model (LLM) to autonomously propose and select tasks, motivated by satisfying its multi-dimensional desires. Specifically, the motivational framework of D2A is mainly constructed by a dynamic Value System, inspired by the Theory of Needs. It incorporates an understanding of human-like desires, such as the need for social interaction, personal fulfillment, and self-care. At each step, the agent evaluates the value of its current state, proposes a set of candidate activities, and selects the one that best aligns with its intrinsic motivations. We conduct experiments on Concordia, a text-based simulator, to demonstrate that our agent generates coherent, contextually relevant daily activities while exhibiting variability and adaptability similar to human behavior. A comparative analysis with other LLM-based agents demonstrates that our approach significantly enhances the rationality of the simulated activities 1 . Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2025 Focusing on the immediate desires and take actions that can satisfy them. Which action satisfies my desires best?
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ca85476c-b1f7-4a58-9a15-0670ad57c54bCited by top-tier papers2
- Why Are We Moral? An LLM-based Agent Simulation Approach to the Study of Moral EvolutionZhou Ziheng, Huacong Tang, Mingjie Bi, Wanying He et al.ACL 2026
- EduMirror: Modeling Educational Social Dynamics with Value-driven Multi-agent SimulationJingzhe Lin, Hengbin Yu, Yongdan Zeng, Fangwei ZhongICML 2026
Builds on9
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model SocietyGuohao Li, Hasan Hammoud, Hani Itani, Dmitrii Khizbullin et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,975 citations
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging FaceYongliang Shen, Kaitao Song, Xu Tan, Dongsheng Li et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,778 citations
- LLM-Planner: Few-Shot Grounded Planning for Embodied Agents with Large Language ModelsChan Hee Song, Brian M. Sadler, Jiaman Wu, Wei-Lun Chao et al.ICCV 2023 · 685 citations
Related papers
- Mind the Gap: The Divergence Between Human and LLM-Generated TasksYi-Long Lu, Jiajun Song, Chunhui Zhang, Wei WangAAAI 2026
- X's Day: Personality-Driven Virtual Human Behavior GenerationHaoyang Li, Zan Wang, Wei Liang, Yizhuo WangIEEE VR 2025 · 5 citations
- AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent BehaviorsWeize Chen, Yusheng Su, Jingwei Zuo, Cheng Yang et al.ICLR 2024 · 594 citations
- Communication-Efficient Desire Alignment for Proactive Embodied Human-Agent InteractionYuanfei Wang, Xinju Huang, Fangwei Zhong, Yaodong Yang et al.ACL 2026
- Learning to Simulate Daily Activities via Modeling Dynamic Human NeedsYuan Yuan, Huandong Wang, Jingtao Ding, Depeng Jin et al.WWW 2023 · 43 citations
