Rethinking Knowledge Transfer in Image Quality Assessment: A Perceptual Preference Structure Alignment Perspective
Aobo Li, Jinjian Wu, Yongxu Liu, Jupo Ma, Weisheng Dong
Abstract
As imaging scenarios diversify rapidly, Image Quality Assessment (IQA) faces a key challenge: how to effectively transfer perceptual knowledge from existing annotated datasets to ensure reliable quality prediction in new scenarios. However, current IQA models struggle to generalize: direct transfer often leads to severe performance degradation, while multi-dataset joint training rarely yields stable gains and can even harm target performance. In this work, we identify perceptual preference structure mismatch as an important and underexplored factor behind transfer failure in IQA. Models trained on different source datasets may rely on different perceptual cues, leading to discrepancies in the conditional distribution P (Y |X) that hinder effective transfer. To address this, we propose Perceptual Preference Representation (PPR), which characterizes dataset-specific perceptual preference structures by analyzing correlations between visual features and quality scores. Based on PPR, we define Perceptual Preference Consistency (PPC), a training-free and interpretable measure of relative preference compatibility across datasets. Building on this, we develop Preference-Structure-Aligned Transfer (PreSTA), which selects source samples better aligned with the target domain in terms of perceptual preference structure. Extensive experiments show that PreSTA achieves superior performance across cross-domain, within-domain, and targeted joint transfer settings while using only a small fraction of source data. These results highlight that aligning perceptual preference structures, rather than simply increasing dataset size, is crucial for effective and dataefficient knowledge transfer in IQA. Code will be publicly available at https://github.com/Li-aobo/PreSTA.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on12
- Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted WindowsZe Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu et al.ICCV 2021 · 31,683 citations
- MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality TransformerJunjie Ke, Qifei Wang, Yilin Wang, Peyman Milanfar et al.ICCV 2021 · 1,325 citations
- Q-Align: Teaching LMMs for Visual Scoring via Discrete Text-Defined LevelsHaoning Wu, Zicheng Zhang, Weixia Zhang, Chaofeng Chen et al.ICML 2024 · 499 citations
- Unsupervised Curriculum Domain Adaptation for No-Reference Video Quality AssessmentPengfei Chen, Leida Li, Jinjian Wu, Weisheng Dong et al.ICCV 2021 · 40 citations
- Boosting Image Quality Assessment Through Efficient Transformer Adaptation with Local Feature EnhancementKangmin Xu, Liang Liao, Jing Xiao, Chaofeng Chen et al.CVPR 2024 · 28 citations
Related papers
- Align-IQA: Aligning Image Quality Assessment Models with Diverse Human Preferences via Customizable GuidanceJunfeng Yang, Jing Fu, Zhen Zhang, Limei Liu et al.ACM MM 2024 · 6 citations
- Not All Distortions Are Created Equal: Distortion-Selective Domain Adaptation for Point Cloud Quality AssessmentYangwei Li, Xiaochuan Wang, Xin Shang, Haisheng LiAAAI 2026
- Bridging the Synthetic-to-Authentic Gap: Distortion-Guided Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Blind Image Quality AssessmentAobo Li, Jinjian Wu, Yongxu Liu, Leida LiCVPR 2024
- QMamba: On First Exploration of Vision Mamba for Image Quality AssessmentFengbin Guan, Xin Li, Zihao Yu, Yiting Lu et al.ICML 2025
- Adaptive Image Quality Assessment via Teaching Large Multimodal Model to CompareHanwei Zhu, Haoning Wu, Yixuan Li, Zicheng Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 108 citations
