Align-IQA: Aligning Image Quality Assessment Models with Diverse Human Preferences via Customizable Guidance
Junfeng Yang, Jing Fu, Zhen Zhang, Limei Liu, Qin Li, Wei Zhang, Wenzhi Cao
Abstract
The alignment of Image Quality Assessment (IQA) models with diverse human preferences remains a challenge, owing to the variability in preferences for different types of visual content, including user-generated content and AI-Generated Content (AIGC), etc. Despite the significant success of existing IQA methods in assessing specific visual content by leveraging knowledge from pre-trained models, the intricate factors impacting final ratings and the specially designed network architecture of these methods result in gaps in their ability to accurately capture human preferences for novel visual content. To address this issue, we propose Align-IQA, a novel framework that aims to generate visual quality scores aligned with diverse human preferences for various types of visual content. Align-IQA contains two key designs: (1) A customizable quality-aware guidance injection module. By injecting specializable quality-aware prior knowledge into general-purpose pre-trained models, the proposed module guides the acquisition of quality-aware features and allows for various adjustments of features to be consistent with diverse human preferences for different types of visual content. (2) A multi-scale feature aggregation module. By simulating the multi-scale mechanism in the human visual system, the proposed module enables the extraction of a more comprehensive representation of quality-aware features from the human perception perspective. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that Align-IQA achieves better or comparable performance to State-Of-The-Art (SOTA) methods. Notably, Align-IQA outperforms the previous best results on AIGC datasets, achieving Pearson's Linear Correlation Coefficients (PLCCs) of 0.890 (+3.73%) on AGIQA-1K and 0.924 (+1.99%) on AGIQA-3K. Additionally, Align-IQA reduces training parameters by 72.26% and inference overhead by 78.12%, while maintaining SOTA performance.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 27d67267-7c0c-4bbe-8d1e-b7e3ced7c6bfCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itRelated papers
- Large Multi-modality Model Assisted AI-Generated Image Quality AssessmentPuyi Wang, Wei Sun, Zicheng Zhang, Jun Jia et al.ACM MM 2024 · 33 citations
- Rethinking Knowledge Transfer in Image Quality Assessment: A Perceptual Preference Structure Alignment PerspectiveAobo Li, Jinjian Wu, Yongxu Liu, Jupo Ma et al.CVPR 2026
- DPGF-Net: Dual-Prior Guided Fusion Network for Joint Assessment of Perceptual Quality and Semantic Consistency in AI-Generated ImagesTao Li, Xingran Liao, Mingliang ZhouCVPR 2026
- AIGV-Assessor: Benchmarking and Evaluating the Perceptual Quality of Text-to-Video Generation with LMMJiarui Wang, Huiyu Duan, Guangtao Zhai, Juntong Wang et al.CVPR 2025
- VQ-Insight: Teaching VLMs for AI-Generated Video Quality Understanding via Progressive Visual Reinforcement LearningXuanyu Zhang, Weiqi Li, Shijie Zhao, Junlin Li et al.AAAI 2026 · 20 citations
