Fundamental Limits of Two-layer Autoencoders, and Achieving Them with Gradient Methods
Aleksandr Shevchenko, Kevin Kögler, Hamed Hassani, Marco Mondelli
Abstract
Autoencoders are a popular model in many branches of machine learning and lossy data compression. However, their fundamental limits, the performance of gradient methods and the features learnt during optimization remain poorly understood, even in the two-layer setting. In fact, earlier work has considered either linear autoencoders or specific training regimes (leading to vanishing or diverging compression rates). Our paper addresses this gap by focusing on non-linear two-layer autoencoders trained in the challenging proportional regime in which the input dimension scales linearly with the size of the representation. Our results characterize the minimizers of the population risk, and show that such minimizers are achieved by gradient methods; their structure is also unveiled, thus leading to a concise description of the features obtained via training. For the special case of a sign activation function, our analysis establishes the fundamental limits for the lossy compression of Gaussian sources via (shallow) autoencoders. Finally, while the results are proved for Gaussian data, numerical simulations on standard datasets display the universality of the theoretical predictions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c97d0fd2-9b64-4c9e-8413-beb82cee562aCited by top-tier papers3
- High-dimensional Asymptotics of Denoising AutoencodersHugo Cui, Lenka ZdeborováNeurIPS 2023 · 26 citations
- Approaching Rate-Distortion Limits in Neural Compression with Lattice Transform CodingEric Lei, Hamed Hassani, Shirin Saeedi BidokhtiICLR 2025
- On the Feature Learning in Diffusion ModelsAndi Han, Wei Huang, Yuan Cao, Difan ZouICLR 2025
Builds on7
- Learning curves of generic features maps for realistic datasets with a teacher-student modelBruno Loureiro, Cédric Gerbelot, Hugo Cui, Sebastian Goldt et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 170 citations
- Towards Empirical Sandwich Bounds on the Rate-Distortion FunctionYibo Yang, Stephan MandtICLR 2022 · 28 citations
- The dynamics of representation learning in shallow, non-linear autoencodersMaria Refinetti, Sebastian GoldtICML 2022 · 25 citations
- Eliminating the Invariance on the Loss Landscape of Linear AutoencodersReza Oftadeh, Jiayi Shen, Zhangyang Wang, Dylan A. ShellICML 2020 · 12 citations
- Binary Iterative Hard Thresholding Converges with Optimal Number of Measurements for 1-Bit Compressed SensingNamiko Matsumoto, Arya MazumdarFOCS 2022 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Compression of Structured Data with Autoencoders: Provable Benefit of Nonlinearities and DepthKevin Kögler, Aleksandr Shevchenko, Hamed Hassani, Marco MondelliICML 2024 · 2 citations
- Implicit Rank-Minimizing AutoencoderLi Jing, Jure Zbontar, Yann LeCunNeurIPS 2020 · 63 citations
- Implicit Bias of Large Depth Networks: a Notion of Rank for Nonlinear FunctionsArthur JacotICLR 2023 · 2 citations
- The Usual Suspects? Reassessing Blame for VAE Posterior CollapseBin Dai, Ziyu Wang, David P. WipfICML 2020 · 89 citations
- A Solvable High-Dimensional Model Where Nonlinear Autoencoders Learn Structure Invisible to PCA While Test Loss Misaligns With GeneralizationVicente Mendes, Lorenzo Bardone, Cédric Koller, Jorge Medina Moreira et al.ICML 2026 · 6 citations
